Science
Related: About this forumJudging knot strength throws people for a loop: Experiment reveals new blind spot in our physical reasoning
https://phys.org/news/2024-12-strength-people-loop-reveals-physical.html(Original article in MIT Press Express: https://direct.mit.edu/opmi/article/doi/10.1162/opmi_a_00159/124792/Tangled-Physics-Knots-Strain-Intuitive-Physical)
For something that has been practiced for eons, this is amazing. Maybe it's because we're in the era of velcro, zip ties, and rubber bands.
Researchers showed people pictures of two knots and asked them to point to the strongest one. They couldn't.
They showed people videos of each knot, where the knots spin slowly so they could get a good long look. They still failed.
People couldn't even manage it when researchers showed them each knot next to a diagram of the knots' construction.
"People are terrible at this," said co-author Chaz Firestone, who studies perception. "Humanity has been using knots for thousands of years. They're not that complicatedthey're just some string tangled up. Yet you can show people real pictures of knots and ask them for any judgment about how the knot will behave and they have no clue."
The work, newly published in the journal Open Mind, reveals a new blind spot in our physical reasoning.
MomInTheCrowd
(333 posts)usonian
(14,352 posts)Knot strength is complex ( who understands topology? ) and results are in practice determined empirically, as in "The boat has broken free of the moorings!" or "knot"
https://news.mit.edu/2015/untangling-mechanics-knots-0908
Simple and intiitive? Not really.
Now researchers at MIT and Pierre et Marie Curie University in Paris have analyzed the mechanical forces underpinning simple knots, and come up with a theory that describes how a knots topology determines its mechanical forces.
The researchers carried out experiments to test how much force is required to tighten knots with an increasing number of twists. They then compared their observations with their theoretical predictions, and found that the theory accurately predicted the force needed to close a knot, given its topology and the diameter and stiffness of the underlying strand.
This is the first time, to the best of our knowledge, that precision model experiments and theory have been tied together to untangle the influence of topology on the mechanics of knots, the researchers write in a paper appearing in the journal Physical Review
Can't go wrong with a bowline. Recommended.
CuriousSavage
(5 posts)Am I blind or are both A&D reef AKA square knots and thus, the stronger knots?
B & C appear to be "granny" knots. After more than a decade of being a Scout leader, I should know by now...
2naSalit
(93,115 posts)Oh NO, it's DEVO!!
Think. Again.
(18,612 posts)...are they knot?
usonian
(14,352 posts)Now, if this isn't obvious (it isn't) that's why there was a scientific study referenced in my post. It's complex. That's why I say that the test was a stretch.
Expecting people to understand the topology of A and B is a bit much. I can't tell you why and I got a bluejacket's manual the hard way and a long stint with fly fishing knots. And a degree in physics for crying out loud.
Oh well. Use a bowline (60 %). whenever it's right, and when I finally master the short cut (50 years out of the service) I'll post it here.
Until then, it's
Over under
Over under
Over under
Pull tight
Or some thing very close to that.