Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Atheists & Agnostics
Related: About this forumRepeal of Johnson Amendment removed from GOP tax bill
At least it's a speck of good news from the GOP's tax scam. But I reckon that Trump will try again.
https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/2017/12/congress-fails-to-repeal-johnson-amendment-in-tax-bill/
The U.S. Senates parliamentarian struck out the language overturning the Johnson Amendment, with the Hill reporting last week that the reason was because it did not meet Senate rules that require elements of the tax bill to have something to do with the budget.
The Senate is seeking to move a House-Senate conference report under special budgetary rules that prevent Democrats from using a filibuster, explained The Hill.
To use those rules, all parts of the bill must have a budgetary effect, and the parliamentarian ruled the Johnson language did not meet that standard.
Introduced by then U.S. Senator Lyndon Baines Johnson in 1954, the Johnson Amendment amended the Internal Revenue Code to prohibit houses of worship and other nonprofits from endorsing political candidates.
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Repeal of Johnson Amendment removed from GOP tax bill (Original Post)
RussBLib
Dec 2017
OP
If the Republicans try again to repeal the Johnson Amendment, they'll need 60 votes for a filibuster
no_hypocrisy
Dec 2017
#1
no_hypocrisy
(49,049 posts)1. If the Republicans try again to repeal the Johnson Amendment, they'll need 60 votes for a filibuster
Even with a handful of sympathetic Democrats, I doubt we'll see much bipartisanship until a new Congress convenes.
RussBLib
(9,686 posts)3. Good point
Unless the GOP changes the rules, and I don't put anything beyond the GOP.
riversedge
(73,276 posts)2. whow. it is good news.
mountain grammy
(27,343 posts)4. Yes its good news
And it would be nice if it was enforced.
RussBLib
(9,686 posts)5. I heard that
IRS hasn't seemed too concerned about violations.
RandomAccess
(5,210 posts)6. Thank heaven