Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
South Dakota
Related: About this forumPronouns and tribal affiliations are now forbidden in South Dakota public university employee emails
https://apnews.com/article/pronouns-tribal-affiliation-south-dakota-66efb8c6a3c57a6a02da0bf4ed575a5fPronouns and tribal affiliations are now forbidden in South Dakota public university employee emails
BY MARGERY A. BECK
Updated 5:40 PM EDT, May 24, 2024
A new South Dakota policy to stop the use of gender pronouns by public university faculty and staff in official correspondence is also keeping Native American employees from listing their tribal affiliations in a state with a long and violent history of conflict with tribes.
Two University of South Dakota faculty members, Megan Red Shirt-Shaw and her husband, John Little, have long included their gender pronouns and tribal affiliations in their work email signature blocks. But both received written warnings from the university in March that doing so violated a policy adopted in December by the South Dakota Board of Regents.
I was told that I had 5 days to remove my tribal affiliation and pronouns, Little said in an email to The Associated Press. I believe the exact wording was that I had 5 days to correct the behavior. If my tribal affiliation and pronouns were not removed after the 5 days, then administrators would meet and make a decision whether I would be suspended (with or without pay) and/or immediately terminated.
The policy is billed by the board as a simple branding and communications policy. It came only months after Republican Gov. Kristi Noem sent a letter to the regents that railed against liberal ideologies on college campuses and called for the board to ban drag shows on campus and remove all references to preferred pronouns in school materials, among other things.
[...]
BY MARGERY A. BECK
Updated 5:40 PM EDT, May 24, 2024
A new South Dakota policy to stop the use of gender pronouns by public university faculty and staff in official correspondence is also keeping Native American employees from listing their tribal affiliations in a state with a long and violent history of conflict with tribes.
Two University of South Dakota faculty members, Megan Red Shirt-Shaw and her husband, John Little, have long included their gender pronouns and tribal affiliations in their work email signature blocks. But both received written warnings from the university in March that doing so violated a policy adopted in December by the South Dakota Board of Regents.
I was told that I had 5 days to remove my tribal affiliation and pronouns, Little said in an email to The Associated Press. I believe the exact wording was that I had 5 days to correct the behavior. If my tribal affiliation and pronouns were not removed after the 5 days, then administrators would meet and make a decision whether I would be suspended (with or without pay) and/or immediately terminated.
The policy is billed by the board as a simple branding and communications policy. It came only months after Republican Gov. Kristi Noem sent a letter to the regents that railed against liberal ideologies on college campuses and called for the board to ban drag shows on campus and remove all references to preferred pronouns in school materials, among other things.
[...]
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pronouns and tribal affiliations are now forbidden in South Dakota public university employee emails (Original Post)
sl8
May 2024
OP
Voltaire2
(14,807 posts)1. The party of 'limited gummint' and Freeze Peach.
Deuxcents
(19,960 posts)2. Might this be some sort of retaliation for the tribes in SD banning her from their tribal lands?
PlutosHeart
(1,445 posts)3. My guess is yes.
Imagine there is a bottomless pit of hate in her. Wonder how else she will attack Indigenous next giving the dog whistle for others in other States to go on attack.
I have been waiting for this sadly. My husband is Indigenous. And a retired prof.