2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWould ted Cruz have won the same voters trump did
Had he been the GOP nominee?
12 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Yes | |
2 (17%) |
|
No | |
10 (83%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
JHan
(10,173 posts)Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)the 46% of eligible Americans that couldn't be bothered to vote with a maniac on the ballot and the Supreme Court hanging in the balance. That, my friend, is the much bigger problem.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)NRQ891
(217 posts)and the question is why - since when is putting up a candidates with record high negatives risk free, particularly when the closest aid has a husband who gets caught sexting a 15 year old girl?
i think these issues are being totally overlooked - that luck was pressed and ran out. both her high negatives, and Weiner's 'hobbies' were known risks, and not managed
The party core doubled down on Hillary knowing this risk. Biden wasn't available due to his son, but Biden really isn't different than Hillary when it comes to policy, and he doesn't have anywhere near the negatives. He would have won, period.
Why couldn't the party find a 'spare Biden'? Why didn't it have one? Why did it ignore Hillary's negatives as a serious risk factor?
NRQ891
(217 posts)and practically none of the protest or populist voters
BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)They absolutely would have voted for Cruz. I have a hard time accepting that anyone could believe otherwise.
Txbluedog
(1,128 posts)They would have never voted for someone with the last name "Cruz"
Response to BobbyDrake (Reply #6)
Name removed Message auto-removed
mtnsnake
(22,236 posts)Back in the Spring the polls had both Trump and Cruz losing to Hillary in the general election, but they had Cruz losing to her by less of a margin than Trump.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)Because she won 2.5 million more. Would he have won pa etc would matter.
texasmomof3
(108 posts)while he does well among right wing evangelicals is that he just uses too many words for every. single. response. ever. He is almost too intellectual in his demeanor if that makes sense. I read I think where he congratulated Trump and for the love man....just say congrats. It was this deep long thought. I think R felt like he would do more talking and less doing.
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)Republicans, racists especially, would have flocked to him to prove they're not racist b y saying "look I voted for the brown guy, I'm not racist."
Vogon_Glory
(9,604 posts)Ted Cruz would not have gotten the same number of voters as Trump did. Tedito's audience appeal veers towards the Religious Right. The Donald is a far more experienced and talented BS artist.
nevergiveup
(4,815 posts)Hillary would have buried Cruz in the general. Trump was a showman who got a huge boost from the media. Cruz would have just been another Republican......a terrible one, for sure.....but still more of an establishment figure.