Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI'm curious about something. If there is a 0.3% spread in Michigan, why not an automatic recount?
Current MI Vote Total as of November 28 (Donald Trump leads by 10,704 votes)
Donald J. Trump (R) 2,279,543 (47.6%)
Hillary Clinton (D) 2,268,839 (47.3%)
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'm curious about something. If there is a 0.3% spread in Michigan, why not an automatic recount? (Original Post)
Farmgirl1961
Dec 2016
OP
drray23
(8,067 posts)1. Because in michigan the law says it has to be less than 2000 votes.
Not a percentage. Stupid but thats their current law.
MichMary
(1,714 posts)2. Someone answered that for me
a couple of days ago.
The law in Michigan states that there is an automatic recount ONLY if there is a difference of 2000 or fewer votes. It doesn't go by percentages, as it does in Pennsylvania.
Wouldn't it be nice if there were a uniform standard that applies to ALL states?
4139
(1,981 posts)3. Law set recount for 2000 votes or less margin
Farmgirl1961
(1,644 posts)4. Thank you and sorry I didn't see your earlier post...Too f'ing bad.