Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumJudge: "vulnerability of our system of voting poses the threat of a potentially devastating attack"
Judges order effectively suspends Michigans recount
Robert Snell and Chad Livengood, The Detroit News 1:28 p.m. EST December 8, 2016
Detroit A federal judge issued an order Wednesday that effectively suspended a recount of the Nov. 8 presidential election that started three days ago and has yet to reveal fraud or significantly alter the results.
The manual statewide recount cost as much as $3 million but stopped after U.S. District Judge Mark Goldsmith lifted a temporary restraining order preventing state officials from stopping a recount prompted by Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein. A state election board meeting scheduled for Thursday meeting was canceled.
Stein failed to show she was an aggrieved candidate as defined by state law and entitled to a recount, the judge said. He concluded Steins request to test the election systems vulnerability to fraud lacked evidence.
The vulnerability of our system of voting poses the threat of a potentially devastating attack on the integrity of our election system, Goldsmith wrote.
Robert Snell and Chad Livengood, The Detroit News 1:28 p.m. EST December 8, 2016
Detroit A federal judge issued an order Wednesday that effectively suspended a recount of the Nov. 8 presidential election that started three days ago and has yet to reveal fraud or significantly alter the results.
The manual statewide recount cost as much as $3 million but stopped after U.S. District Judge Mark Goldsmith lifted a temporary restraining order preventing state officials from stopping a recount prompted by Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein. A state election board meeting scheduled for Thursday meeting was canceled.
Stein failed to show she was an aggrieved candidate as defined by state law and entitled to a recount, the judge said. He concluded Steins request to test the election systems vulnerability to fraud lacked evidence.
The vulnerability of our system of voting poses the threat of a potentially devastating attack on the integrity of our election system, Goldsmith wrote.
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge: "vulnerability of our system of voting poses the threat of a potentially devastating attack" (Original Post)
Coyotl
Dec 2016
OP
renate
(13,776 posts)2. so, what if Hillary requested the recount?--she would be an aggrieved candidate
This would seem to be a pretty easy fix--I wonder why it hasn't been done.
triron
(22,240 posts)3. You and me both.
FBaggins
(27,833 posts)4. She would be fine...
... IF she has done so a couple weeks ago.