Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

vaberella

(24,634 posts)
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 09:44 PM Jan 2017

Bernie, Bernie, Bernie...

I'm really fed up with so many on this site blaming Bernie for HRC's loss. A loss is a loss. If people truly believed in her, they would have voted for her. I read recently Bernie forced HRC to lean more left than remain centrist. That wasn't the case between her and Obama; and she lost to him.

States, I truly never would turn red turned red---like Pennsylvania. Yeah, that really shocked me. I don't think Bernie had anything to do with that. Was/Am I a Bernie supporter hell yeah! But I wasn't supporting Bernie because I hated HRC---I was actually supporting a person who was adding to a two party system and leading a strong coalition.

I HATE a two party system. I hate the electoral college. Voices are lost---you either have to stick to one or another but can't seem to move past it. I liked Bernie's politics, no doubt. But he was building something there that I feel the US needed. Not to mention it was a focus on social programs that I appreciate.

In reality, if we have to blame someone or people for HRC's loss---it's the fact she could not in any way connect with uneducated White women voters. Not to mention her ratings with educated White women voters versus Trumps was negligible. Bernie didn't do anything. I think even the reporters were shocked by how much White women voters influenced the election---because they had spent so much of their time on the Latino vote.

They took for granted that White women voters would go for HRC without a doubt. Just like they expected Obama to have the Black vote. They underestimated their numbers, presence, and what they stood for. Never take women for granted, no matter the colour of their skin.

So rather than harass Bernie---lets focus on voting statistics and who matter aside from getting our small town people to run for town elections. That's the way to make proactive changes and who's minds we have to influence if not change.

43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie, Bernie, Bernie... (Original Post) vaberella Jan 2017 OP
Oh Boy! Where's my popcorn? leftofcool Jan 2017 #1
Seriously. FSogol Jan 2017 #2
... WhiteTara Jan 2017 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author Chasstev365 Jan 2017 #11
Hell! sheshe2 Jan 2017 #13
I'm sure drama will erupt...sigh. n/a vaberella Jan 2017 #6
I'm with ya'! fleur-de-lisa Jan 2017 #8
I do NOT blame Bernie. I do blame Comey and the FBI. Bernie after all endorsed Hillary, and still_one Jan 2017 #3
A third party has got to be formed at the grass roots level and build up. Shortcuts just fuck us up bettyellen Jan 2017 #5
I didn't say they didn't matter. Shoot to me Trump was a sleeper KGB. vaberella Jan 2017 #9
it was a pretty big thing and one of the biggest things pushed against her even on this site JI7 Jan 2017 #12
HRC didn't lose the election. It was a Russian backed coup. underthematrix Jan 2017 #7
What kind of country are we to have KGB agent sleeper cells? n/t vaberella Jan 2017 #10
lulz Rex Jan 2017 #14
Bernie has large responsibility for why we are where we are. democratisphere Jan 2017 #15
Bull. TDale313 Jan 2017 #21
Everyone understands the status quo can not continue, but democratisphere Jan 2017 #22
Oh god no. TDale313 Jan 2017 #23
Sadly, many are using legitimate concerns about Russia-- QC Jan 2017 #41
It's ridiculous that anyone blames a primary candidate for a general loss VoicesAcrossAmerica Jan 2017 #16
That's an accurate view, IMO. Plus, any former Bernie supporters who didn't turn out for her JudyM Jan 2017 #18
Whatever helps you sleep at night. nt JTFrog Jan 2017 #34
I might have a bit more insight into what happened on the Sanders side, but think what you need to. JudyM Jan 2017 #35
Whatever helps you sleep at night. nt JTFrog Jan 2017 #36
Tough. He screwed Clinton over just like Kennedy screwed Carter over. JTFrog Jan 2017 #33
Took 8 weeks and 3 days after the nomination was won... joshcryer Jan 2017 #17
He followed rules. The same cannot be said for her campaign. That's why many lost all enthusiasm JudyM Jan 2017 #19
Yeah, by appointing a Jill Stein supporter to the DNC committee. joshcryer Jan 2017 #20
The rust belt went "meh" TDale313 Jan 2017 #24
The negative framing of Hillary worked and remained with voters who described voting for her as: JHan Jan 2017 #27
+1 uponit7771 Jan 2017 #38
LOL, ok if you say so. I'm sure that's what happened. The rust belt went meh because of Bernie. JudyM Jan 2017 #28
If he had done so immediately marlakay Jan 2017 #42
The illogic continues. joshcryer Jan 2017 #43
Post removed Post removed Jan 2017 #25
I'm really fed up........ stonecutter357 Jan 2017 #26
No, The Systems Not Totally Rigged. But That Idea Sure Helped Donald Trump. Gothmog Jan 2017 #29
Have you bought his latest book yet? Gothmog Jan 2017 #30
Lol. He used our party for money, media and then was a spoiler of the worst kind. JTFrog Jan 2017 #31
"I read recently Bernie forced HRC to lean more left than remain centrist." betsuni Jan 2017 #32
Bernie decided to be the Ralph Nader of 2016. There have been consequences. delisen Jan 2017 #37
Give it up dude, it's over! CajunBlazer Jan 2017 #39
He saw an opportunity to make some money and took it. nt LexVegas Jan 2017 #40

Response to WhiteTara (Reply #4)

fleur-de-lisa

(14,674 posts)
8. I'm with ya'!
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 09:52 PM
Jan 2017

I supported Bernie in the primary but happily voted for Hillary during the general election, especially after it was apparent what Comey was up to.

A maniac takes office tomorrow!

still_one

(96,779 posts)
3. I do NOT blame Bernie. I do blame Comey and the FBI. Bernie after all endorsed Hillary, and
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 09:48 PM
Jan 2017

encouraged his supporters to vote for her.

I also blame those progressives who refused to vote for Hillary by either voting third party or not voting


 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
5. A third party has got to be formed at the grass roots level and build up. Shortcuts just fuck us up
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 09:51 PM
Jan 2017

Why are all the Sanders fans down playing the Russian hacking? Is is because they are that propaganda up too and spread it all over? Seriously, if you don't think Comney and the hacking mattered I think you're tripping.
It mattered a great deal.

vaberella

(24,634 posts)
9. I didn't say they didn't matter. Shoot to me Trump was a sleeper KGB.
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 09:52 PM
Jan 2017

I'm just saying there was more here than just comies...especially when I look at the numbers. I'm sorry--I don't think comies really think as far as women voters. Just saying.

JI7

(90,758 posts)
12. it was a pretty big thing and one of the biggest things pushed against her even on this site
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 10:08 PM
Jan 2017

underthematrix

(5,811 posts)
7. HRC didn't lose the election. It was a Russian backed coup.
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 09:51 PM
Jan 2017

This needs to be your starting place because this is not about an individual. This is about the overthrow of our govt.

democratisphere

(17,235 posts)
15. Bernie has large responsibility for why we are where we are.
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 10:53 PM
Jan 2017

Bernie is also not a democrat. It is too late now, but should be remembered next time so we don't shoot ourselves in the foot and become losers again.

TDale313

(7,822 posts)
21. Bull.
Fri Jan 20, 2017, 01:32 AM
Jan 2017

People are frustrated with the status quo. They feel their needs are not being addressed. Dems can figure out how to deal with that or they can continue to lose.

democratisphere

(17,235 posts)
22. Everyone understands the status quo can not continue, but
Fri Jan 20, 2017, 07:58 AM
Jan 2017

I also believe very few would want what is about to besiege US.

TDale313

(7,822 posts)
23. Oh god no.
Fri Jan 20, 2017, 08:04 AM
Jan 2017

This is truly frightening. And I live in a deep blue state and still supported Hillary in the General because she was far better than the alternative and in the end I wanted her to have as strong a showing in the popular vote as possible- to repudiate Trump and his hate filled agenda.

But Dems need to wake up. This should have been a major soul- searching moment. If anything should have told them "what we're doing isn't working" this should have been it. Sadly I don't get the sense that the message was received.

QC

(26,371 posts)
41. Sadly, many are using legitimate concerns about Russia--
Fri Jan 20, 2017, 11:21 AM
Jan 2017

and yes, those concerns are absolutely justified--to avoid doing that soul-searching.

Everything is fine, they tell themselves, so let's just keep doing what we've been doing. No need to question anything. La la la la la I can't hear you.

 
16. It's ridiculous that anyone blames a primary candidate for a general loss
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 11:11 PM
Jan 2017

For those who don't remember, in 2008 it was really close between Obama and Clinton. Had it gone the other way, wanna bet how many people would have blamed Obama for Clinton's eventual loss to McCain?

What the DC Dems don't understand is that Republicans HATE Clinton. It isn't fair. She doesn't deserve it. But they are rabid. And because she's not a great campaigner, she doesn't inspire the base to overcome this.

Primaries have been a lot more vicious than Bernie vs Hillary. He isn't responsible for articulating the way many people in the country feel. And voters are not responsible for not voting for her. It was the job of her campaign to create a strategy to beat Trump. But because they were primarily a bunch of rich white democrats, those are the only states they managed to win. They truly thought they could make Republicans vote for Hilary if they just showed them how awful Trump was. The problem is, Republicans are Republicans because they want Republican programs. And they really want a Conservative Supreme Court Justice. That "Trumped" their personal dislike of Trump.

Had Clinton's team chosen a strategy to inspire people to vote for her she'd have won. But I'm sorry, the worst idea I've ever heard in my life is I'm With Her. Had they simply changed it to She's With Me even it would have been so much better.

JudyM

(29,536 posts)
18. That's an accurate view, IMO. Plus, any former Bernie supporters who didn't turn out for her
Fri Jan 20, 2017, 12:21 AM
Jan 2017

made that choice not because Bernie didn't endorse her immediately (that's ridiculous!) but because they were too revolted by the rigging by the DNC et al..., in other words, by strategic decisions made by or for Hillary's campaign, which were reasonably attributed to her. I was really turned off by how her campaign tried to keep Sanders down procedurally rather than trying to win on the issues. I ended up up voting for her but I can see why less devoted Dems who supported sanders may have sat home.

Welcome to DU!

JudyM

(29,536 posts)
35. I might have a bit more insight into what happened on the Sanders side, but think what you need to.
Fri Jan 20, 2017, 09:50 AM
Jan 2017

Because how could DWS & Hillary's strategy have anything to do with her loss of the electoral vote?

 

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)
33. Tough. He screwed Clinton over just like Kennedy screwed Carter over.
Fri Jan 20, 2017, 09:45 AM
Jan 2017

There is definitely a lesson to be learned here. But it's not whatever you are trying to sell.

joshcryer

(62,506 posts)
17. Took 8 weeks and 3 days after the nomination was won...
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 11:34 PM
Jan 2017

...before Sanders endorsed Clinton.

Absurd.

JudyM

(29,536 posts)
19. He followed rules. The same cannot be said for her campaign. That's why many lost all enthusiasm
Fri Jan 20, 2017, 12:29 AM
Jan 2017

for her. The amount of time taken to endorse her didn't make a difference -or can you point to evidence that it did? That's just a false trope used to blame Bernie. The DNC pulled tricks to keep him marginalized and that deviousness came to light and hurt Hillary. After the convention Bernie actually was on the road campaigning for her more than she herself was campaigning... check his schedule, he worked hard to get her elected.

joshcryer

(62,506 posts)
20. Yeah, by appointing a Jill Stein supporter to the DNC committee.
Fri Jan 20, 2017, 12:51 AM
Jan 2017

DNCs shenanigans did not result in Clinton getting 4 million more votes than Sanders. It's absurd on the face of it.

Had Clinton waited 8 weeks to endorse Obama in 2008 people would have rightly been outraged. Somehow logic and reason just go out the window here.

They needed a joint unity campaign like what happened in 2008. Instead Clinton was forced into appeasement mode and the rust belt went meh.

TDale313

(7,822 posts)
24. The rust belt went "meh"
Fri Jan 20, 2017, 08:07 AM
Jan 2017

Because fairly or not we had a Candidate in the General whose last name has become synonymous with Nafta and bad trade deals.

JHan

(10,173 posts)
27. The negative framing of Hillary worked and remained with voters who described voting for her as:
Fri Jan 20, 2017, 08:52 AM
Jan 2017

1) holding their nose
2) lesser of two evils

She deserved neither of those descriptions and it affected enthusiasm. When the polls showed she was a sure bet, lots stayed home because they'd rather not - as if HRC was the most disgusting thing to vote for ever.

Now we have a shameless narcissistic pathetic incompetent treasonous PoS about to be *President.

JudyM

(29,536 posts)
28. LOL, ok if you say so. I'm sure that's what happened. The rust belt went meh because of Bernie.
Fri Jan 20, 2017, 09:20 AM
Jan 2017


It was strategic decisions. Don't spend time in WI, spend more time getting donations than having rallies to gin up enthusiasm.

Why didn't Hillary stand up for those of us who voted for her by challenging the close votes in WI, MI etc? And be sure to blame that on Sanders, too.

marlakay

(12,205 posts)
42. If he had done so immediately
Fri Jan 20, 2017, 11:50 AM
Jan 2017

More of his followrs wouldn't have followed him to Hillary. He was doing what he promised his people and slowly pulled them towards her.

He had a strong movement and he knew if he moved sooner more would vote third party.

joshcryer

(62,506 posts)
43. The illogic continues.
Fri Jan 20, 2017, 11:51 AM
Jan 2017

The very people who didn't vote were the rust belt which he was engaging.

He did not get them out to vote.

Response to vaberella (Original post)

Gothmog

(155,157 posts)
29. No, The Systems Not Totally Rigged. But That Idea Sure Helped Donald Trump.
Fri Jan 20, 2017, 09:38 AM
Jan 2017

Here is a good example Sanders really hurting Clinton. I am still mad at the number of times that trump used Sanders' claims against Clinton. Sanders' baseless charges that the system was fixed and rigged were used by trump to great effect and hurt Clinton http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/rigged-system-donald-trump_us_5855cb44e4b08debb7898607?section=us_politics

And if Sanders’ rhetoric during the primaries started that stew simmering with his talk about the system only working for the rich, Trump brought it to a full boil with his remarks blaming undocumented immigrants and trade agreements that he claimed were forged as the result of open corruption.

I think he was able to thread a certain toxic needle. But he did win, and we’re all going to pay the price.
John Weaver, aide to Ohio Gov. John Kasich’s presidential campaign

The underlying irony for those who sought to end what they perceived as corruption is that they may well have elected a president whose record through the years and whose actions since the election signal it could be the most openly corrupt administration in generations.....

And if Sanders’ rhetoric during the primaries started that stew simmering with his talk about the system only working for the rich, Trump brought it to a full boil with his remarks blaming undocumented immigrants and trade agreements that he claimed were forged as the result of open corruption.

Sanders' bogus rigged process claim hurt a great deal.
 

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)
31. Lol. He used our party for money, media and then was a spoiler of the worst kind.
Fri Jan 20, 2017, 09:42 AM
Jan 2017

We should never allow that to happen again. Period.

And why does it seem that only Bernie and Stein supporters are in denial? They also deny that Comey, Russia, racism, sexism, gerrymandering, cheating or hacking had anything to do with the outcome.

It's all laughable.

P.S. - Buy My Book!


delisen

(6,544 posts)
37. Bernie decided to be the Ralph Nader of 2016. There have been consequences.
Fri Jan 20, 2017, 10:18 AM
Jan 2017

The Nader revolt against the "establishment" and the Sanders revolt against the "establishment." Every so many election cycles we relearn the harsh lesson: There is a difference between the two parties.

Clinton connected with enough men and women to win an election by almost 3 million votes.

Bernie Sanders is a big boy. He does not seem to feel harassed. He played hardball politics, heeded some good and he did some damage. He doesn't seem to be worrying about the damage and seems comfortable working within the confines of the new illegitimate government. He is a reformer and that is OK.

I find his vision narrow-and in the tradition of that Democratic Party mistake of 2004 -John Edwards. (Sanders being more ethical however). I myself am not a true believer in any political leader. I think true believers damage Democracy which requires reasoning and judgement in an electorate.

Democracy is under attack in a way it has not been since World War II. We had a gutsy Secretary of State Hillary Clinton who publicly denounced the new authoritarianism in Russia and stood up for free elections. She has paid a political price. Maybe she should have kept her mouth shut, played it safe, ignored human rights, figuring few of us would care anyway, worked out oil deals with Putin.

I suspect Putin would have preferred to hack an election for a pragmatically evil but well-organized person rather than the unpredictable Trump-but we will never know.





Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie, Bernie, Bernie...