DU Community Help
Related: About this forumUnable to complete Jury Duty
Hi all,
I just got asked to serve on a jury about a post.
Unfortunately, by the time I got to the actual post, there had been so much back and forth in the posts above, it was impossible to see the post in question!
(The stacking had pushed it off the edge, and even fully scrolled to the right, all I saw was a sliver of the red color of the post.)
The only thing I could do was cancel out of jury service, which I hated to do!
Am I going to get any sort of penalty for doing this?
And if so, who would I contact about that?
Thanks!
Ferrets are Cool
(22,077 posts)at least for me it is. Makes it easy.
Oops, I didn't read all your post. My bad.
TwilightZone
(28,834 posts)There are about 500 responses in the thread. In jury service, they're tiled so that each one is slightly to the right of the above it. The post in question was down far enough that it scrolled off the page and no text was visible.
Ferrets are Cool
(22,077 posts)TwilightZone
(28,834 posts)I've been on juries for a long, long time and had never seen one scroll entirely off the page. Usually, one can do a search and figure out which post it was, but that wasn't working, either. First time for everything!
Bev54
(11,959 posts)that we were supposed to make the decision on.
TwilightZone
(28,834 posts)There's no penalty for canceling jury service. In this instance, like you, I didn't see any other alternative.
Bev54
(11,959 posts)I suspect they will look into it when everyone does the same.
Marie Marie
(10,040 posts)I canceled out too.
femmedem
(8,469 posts)sweetloukillbot
(12,678 posts)The post was in red, but it was less than a half-inch wide and would not display.
Sucha NastyWoman
(2,958 posts)Wrote a note about it under Ask the Administrators, but Im not sure that was the best place to do that.
niyad
(121,642 posts)getagrip_already
(17,621 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(122,463 posts)It was impossible to read the post that was to be evaluated. Dont know if the thread was really that long or if there was some kind of glitch.
gibraltar72
(7,629 posts)it just kept going further to right until it left the screen. I backed up and opted out. Never had that happen before.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)nobody can read the jury thread.
From the way it was going, looks like no point voting to hide it anyway.
samnsara
(18,354 posts)..Im not going to ruin someones day with just a guess.
kimmylavin
(2,292 posts)First time that happened to me!
Just didn't want to be in jury duty jail or anything.
plcdude
(5,321 posts)It seemed bogus to me so I canceled out also too many posts and could not find the one in question
bullimiami
(14,011 posts)paleotn
(19,822 posts)When it gets that far out of hand, just delete the whole damn thing. Ugh.
Bradshaw3
(7,962 posts)Like others, I tried several times to read the reported post and couldn't. Then I went and read the OP and it was ridiculous what was going on. The whole thread should have been deleted. Just tit for tat. One of the posters I had on ignore for doing the same thing before.
PJMcK
(23,251 posts)I've never turned down Jury Service before.
It was a weird graphic problem.
Oh, well. The thread seemed pretty aggressive anyway.
plcdude
(5,321 posts)It seemed bogus to me so I canceled out also too many posts and could not find the one in question
Unable to view the reported post.
gademocrat7
(11,275 posts)likesmountains 52
(4,194 posts)dlk
(12,529 posts)melm00se
(5,082 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)going on, so I canceled.
For one reason, I seldom block posts unless the alerted post threaten someone or is a vile message. Just about anything else can be handled by rebuffing or rebutting the original poster if one doesn't agree with it.
Similarly, I seldom block posts that someone alerts saying the post is "pushing right wing talking points." Just because one says they don't support say mandatory Medicare-for-All, it is not a "right wing talking point." That "right wing talking point" is overused here and is usually just someone who doesn't like someone's opinion. We should welcome most opinions even if we strongly disagree. As above, if you don't agree with them, say so in a rebuttal post.
Another thing, it used to be that one could go back to the original thread before voting so that a jury member can determine the entire context of the alerted post. Since we can no longer do that, I seldom vote to block a post. As above, if you don't agree with the post, say so. Also, under the old system, you could actually write a comment about why you decided to hide or allow. And the alerted poster got to see those (but not the juror's name). I really liked that.
I'm a little more strict on thread titles because a lot of people just read those and not the thread. Thread titles should be accurate and fair.
In any event, you don't get disciplined for canceling out of a jury.
Oh, I have only alerted on one post in 15 some years here. It was one of mine that I thought better of later.
northoftheborder
(7,615 posts)progree
(11,505 posts)I let someone else decide in my place, someone who might know the background and context of the issue more than I do.
Tarc
(10,583 posts)I was able to copy it all an dump it into Word, to see what the post actually was at least. But no way to get over to click the actual buttons.
EarlG
(22,706 posts)We are looking into it.
kimmylavin
(2,292 posts)Knew you guys would be on it; was just trying to figure out how to get you!
Roland99
(53,345 posts)niyad
(121,642 posts)sheshe2
(89,004 posts)Me as well.
OilemFirchen
(7,181 posts)Something tells me it's all the same thread.