Can you see Jury Results?

[wildflowergardener]

I have been asked to serve on more Juries this past week then ever before. i have done my best to respond with what I think is the correct answer but I am not always positive, and it would be helpful to be able to see how others responded afterwards and read the entire thread since all we see is one or two posts in order to make that decision. I tried searching for the answer, it seems there used to be but not sure if it is there still. Looking for the results and the full thread if its still up for any particular jury I have served on. Thanks for anyone who can point me in the right direction if there is a way.

[ms liberty]

1. We used to be able to, and that's why we don't have it now.

People could leave comments with their vote. It incited some nasty flamewars.

[rzemanfl]

2. No, and your post is a technical rule violation. I suggest you delete. Watch for a PM.

[Shermann]

3. Which rule would that be? nt

[rzemanfl]

4. Forum moderation.

[Ocelot II]

5. Asking a question about DU's processes in the community help forum

doesn't strike me as a complaint about forum moderation; it was just a question about how it works. But I suppose questioning the questioning of the question will get me in trouble, too..

[rzemanfl]

7. There are presently folks or machines here that alert on damn near anything.

[Shermann]

6. There is in fact a DU rule about interfering with forum moderation

However, the OP's query doesn't interfere with anything, let alone forum moderation.

[rzemanfl]

8. Please see my response above.

I have had bad experiences.

[Shermann]

9. Irrelevant, I suggest deleting your post. nt

[rzemanfl]

11. This

Don't interfere with forum moderation
Don't post messages about site rules, enforcement, juries, hosts, administration, alerts, alerters, removed posts, appeals, locked threads, or anything else related to how this website is moderated (except in the Ask the Administrators forum).

[Shermann]

15. Link to "Ask the Administrators" forum? nt

[hlthe2b]

10. They are merely asking a question about the process--not specific cases nor criticizing.

That hardly seems like "interfering with forum moderation" and I do not believe the admins ever meant that to be used as a cudgel against someone just trying to understand the process not referencing any specific case--particularly since the "Ask the Admins" forum no longer exists.

[rzemanfl]

13. The rule is posted above. The specific outweighs the general IMHO. I am through with this.

[hlthe2b]

16. None of which contradicts what I (and others) have posted.

The (relative) newbie is merely asking for clarification--not making a complaint nor referencing a specific case. And as previously pointed out, the Ask the Admin forum no longer exists.

[wildflowergardener]

18. 20 years

Ha I have been here 20 years but I don’t post much

[Shermann]

19. Good on you, I always advocate quality over quantity! nt

[hlthe2b]

20. Good to know..

[wildflowergardener]

12. Not a complaint

Just trying to understand how it all works

[wildflowergardener]

14. Ask the administrators forum

Ok where is ask the administrators forum. I looked and didn’t find it. I can post there instead if necessary. It is not in the forum list and that is why I posted my question here.

[wildflowergardener]

17. Thanks for the answer

I believe my question has been answered and see above the ask the administrator forum no longer exists.

[Frasier Balzov]

21. In real courtrooms, juries are fully cognizant of the verdict.

A DU profile feature which shows you how you voted and the eventual outcome of the alert would be informative feedback about your own conduct as a community enforcer.

The system certainly makes me aware of when a post of mine gets hidden!

But new features like this cost money to pay talented people to program it.