Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Harris 2020
Related: About this forum
You are in the Harris 2020 Group. Only members who have selected Kamala Harris as their preferred Democratic presidential candidate are permitted to post in this Group.
"Sen. Kamala Harris: A.G. Barr Clearly Intended To Mislead The American Public Hardball MSNBC"
&feature=youtu.be
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Sen. Kamala Harris: A.G. Barr Clearly Intended To Mislead The American Public Hardball MSNBC" (Original Post)
Kaleva
May 2019
OP
"Barr thinks of himself as the President's attorney, instead of for the American people"
FailureToCommunicate
May 2019
#2
To my ears, she seemed to be more 'nuanced' in some of her answers to Mathews, when
FailureToCommunicate
May 2019
#4
yuiyoshida
(42,985 posts)1. I just love her, she is so wicked smart....
and yet on the other hand has her humorous moments.
FailureToCommunicate
(14,355 posts)2. "Barr thinks of himself as the President's attorney, instead of for the American people"
She did have good things to say, but I was a bit disappointed that she was not quite as forceful as earlier in the day, and seemed to walk back some of her strong statements made right after the hearing.
Kaleva
(38,666 posts)3. When did she walk back her statements?
Kamala was strong in answering questions right after the hearing and later on Hardball with Chris Matthews.
And here she is answering questions right after the hearing:
Link to tweet
FailureToCommunicate
(14,355 posts)4. To my ears, she seemed to be more 'nuanced' in some of her answers to Mathews, when
he pressed her about earlier statements, IMHO.
No big deal, just sounded that way to me.
wysimdnwyg
(2,257 posts)5. I suspect that's more of a "heat of the moment" reaction...
vs having time to reflect a bit and make a more thoughtful statement. It's not walking anything back, but "more nuanced" is probably accurate. And not necessarily a bad thing.