Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Liberal YouTubers
Related: About this forumSCOTUS hands Trump MAJOR LOSS for MIDTERM ELECTIONS!! - Meidas Touch
In breaking news, the United States Supreme Court in stunning 9-0 fashion has effectively blessed Californias new congressional maps adding 5 democratic seats for the Midterms.
Michael Popok explains how far right Justice Alito is to thank for this big win, and how this will play out with attempts to redraw maps with the limited time remaining before candidates are declared and ballots printed for the Midterms. - 02/04/2026.
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SCOTUS hands Trump MAJOR LOSS for MIDTERM ELECTIONS!! - Meidas Touch (Original Post)
Rhiannon12866
12 hrs ago
OP
Deadline Legal Blog-Supreme Court allows California congressional map ahead of midterm elections
LetMyPeopleVote
9 hrs ago
#1
LetMyPeopleVote
(176,503 posts)1. Deadline Legal Blog-Supreme Court allows California congressional map ahead of midterm elections
The high court previously approved Texas GOP-friendly map, which Californias Proposition 50 sought to counter.
Link to tweet
https://www.ms.now/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/supreme-court-allows-california-congressional-map-midterm-elections
The Supreme Court rejected an emergency appeal from Republicans to halt Californias congressional map, which was passed in response to Texas Republican-friendly effort, launched at President Donald Trumps urging ahead of the November midterm elections.
The high court rejection came Wednesday in an unexplained order with no justices noting dissent.
In December, the Supreme Court approved Texas map on the grounds that it was motivated by partisan considerations, which the court has permitted, and not by unlawful racial considerations. When the court sided with Texas, it also seemed to cite Californias effort approvingly. Justice Samuel Alito wrote in a concurring opinion that the impetus for the adoption of the Texas map (like the map subsequently adopted in California) was partisan advantage pure and simple.
A divided lower-court panel cited the Supreme Court order in the Texas case when it rejected a GOP challenge to Californias map. Republicans appealed to the justices, leading to Wednesdays order.
The high court rejection came Wednesday in an unexplained order with no justices noting dissent.
In December, the Supreme Court approved Texas map on the grounds that it was motivated by partisan considerations, which the court has permitted, and not by unlawful racial considerations. When the court sided with Texas, it also seemed to cite Californias effort approvingly. Justice Samuel Alito wrote in a concurring opinion that the impetus for the adoption of the Texas map (like the map subsequently adopted in California) was partisan advantage pure and simple.
A divided lower-court panel cited the Supreme Court order in the Texas case when it rejected a GOP challenge to Californias map. Republicans appealed to the justices, leading to Wednesdays order.
Rhiannon12866
(252,022 posts)2. Thank you!