Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Rhiannon12866

(252,022 posts)
Wed Feb 4, 2026, 04:09 PM 12 hrs ago

SCOTUS hands Trump MAJOR LOSS for MIDTERM ELECTIONS!! - Meidas Touch



In breaking news, the United States Supreme Court in stunning 9-0 fashion has effectively blessed California’s new congressional maps adding 5 democratic seats for the Midterms.

Michael Popok explains how far right Justice Alito is to thank for this big win, and how this will play out with attempts to redraw maps with the limited time remaining before candidates are declared and ballots printed for the Midterms. - 02/04/2026.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SCOTUS hands Trump MAJOR LOSS for MIDTERM ELECTIONS!! - Meidas Touch (Original Post) Rhiannon12866 12 hrs ago OP
Deadline Legal Blog-Supreme Court allows California congressional map ahead of midterm elections LetMyPeopleVote 9 hrs ago #1
Thank you! Rhiannon12866 9 hrs ago #2

LetMyPeopleVote

(176,503 posts)
1. Deadline Legal Blog-Supreme Court allows California congressional map ahead of midterm elections
Wed Feb 4, 2026, 07:50 PM
9 hrs ago

The high court previously approved Texas’ GOP-friendly map, which California’s Proposition 50 sought to counter.



https://www.ms.now/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/supreme-court-allows-california-congressional-map-midterm-elections

The Supreme Court rejected an emergency appeal from Republicans to halt California’s congressional map, which was passed in response to Texas’ Republican-friendly effort, launched at President Donald Trump’s urging ahead of the November midterm elections.

The high court rejection came Wednesday in an unexplained order with no justices noting dissent.

In December, the Supreme Court approved Texas’ map on the grounds that it was motivated by partisan considerations, which the court has permitted, and not by unlawful racial considerations. When the court sided with Texas, it also seemed to cite California’s effort approvingly. Justice Samuel Alito wrote in a concurring opinion that “the impetus for the adoption of the Texas map (like the map subsequently adopted in California) was partisan advantage pure and simple.”

A divided lower-court panel cited the Supreme Court order in the Texas case when it rejected a GOP challenge to California’s map. Republicans appealed to the justices, leading to Wednesday’s order.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Liberal YouTubers»SCOTUS hands Trump MAJOR ...