Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Rhiannon12866

(223,448 posts)
Thu Nov 14, 2024, 03:15 AM Nov 14

This Dangerous New Law Could Label ANYONE a Terrorist! EVEN YOU! - Thom Hartmann



One of the first things fascist regimes do is label their opposition as terrorists. Donald Trump already said he would go after his political enemies and this new law could be exactly what he needs to do it. - Aired on 11/13/2024.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This Dangerous New Law Could Label ANYONE a Terrorist! EVEN YOU! - Thom Hartmann (Original Post) Rhiannon12866 Nov 14 OP
Given Thom's assessment of the proposed legislation, I remain very confused about the alwaysinasnit Nov 14 #1
Thank you! I hope that we hear an explanation soon Rhiannon12866 Nov 14 #2
DU'er cbabe also posted about it, also hoping someone could explain why. Giving the orange Caligula alwaysinasnit Nov 14 #3
Good Grief, same here!!! Rhiannon12866 Nov 14 #4
Like you, I would really like to know, especially because it seems so out of character from what alwaysinasnit Nov 14 #5
Be aware be afraid burrowowl Nov 14 #6

alwaysinasnit

(5,276 posts)
1. Given Thom's assessment of the proposed legislation, I remain very confused about the
Thu Nov 14, 2024, 03:40 AM
Nov 14

recent House vote on it that included 52 Democrats. I posted earlier about an article from Common Dreams on this topic.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100219718021

No Thanks to These 52 Dems, House Defeats Bill Enabling Trump Assault on Nonprofits

Legislation that would have handed President-elect Donald Trump sweeping power to investigate and shutter news outlets, government watchdogs, humanitarian organizations, and other nonprofits was defeated in the House of Representatives on Tuesday after a coalition of progressive advocacy groups and lawmakers mobilized against it, warning of the bill's dire implications for the right to dissent.

But 52 Democratic lawmakers—including Reps. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), Henry Cuellar (D-Texas), and Ritchie Torres (D-N.Y.)—apparently did not share the grave concerns expressed by the ACLU and other leading rights groups, opting to vote alongside 204 Republicans in favor of the bill.

One Republican, Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, joined 144 Democrats in voting no.

The measure ultimately fell short of the two-thirds majority needed to approve legislation under the fast-track procedure used by the bill's supporters, but progressives wasted no time spotlighting the Democrats who supported the measure.

snip...


I understand that the bill has two parts and that the first part is for a good purpose, but the second part is just awful. So why would 52 Democrats vote for it? I just can't come up with a reasonable rationale for why so many Democrats would do so.

alwaysinasnit

(5,276 posts)
3. DU'er cbabe also posted about it, also hoping someone could explain why. Giving the orange Caligula
Thu Nov 14, 2024, 03:58 AM
Nov 14

even more power to use arbitrarily is beyond my comprehension.

alwaysinasnit

(5,276 posts)
5. Like you, I would really like to know, especially because it seems so out of character from what
Thu Nov 14, 2024, 04:15 AM
Nov 14

Rep. Schiff and other Dems have stood for.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Liberal YouTubers»This Dangerous New Law Co...