Amnesty International Investigation Concludes Israel Is Committing Genocide

[Beastly Boy]

8. What happens when only certain criticism of Israel is deemed antisemitic, and others are not?

For Instance, what if a certain NGO were to say ""Since its establishment in 1948, Israel has pursued an explicit policy of establishing and maintaining a Jewish demographic hegemony and maximizing its control over land to benefit Jewish Israelis," while disregarding the essentially multicultural permissive nature of Israel and discounting that Israel's control over land (with no distinction to what land the statement refers) equally benefits all Israelis, Jewish or not, and some control of land benefits Israel's minorities more than it does the Jewish majority?

Imagine Amnesty accusing France of committing genocide on the basis of "an explicit policy of establishing and maintaining a French demographic hegemony and maximizing its control over land to benefit the Catholic citizens of France"

Wouldn't that be ridiculous?

Didn't stop Amnesty from getting ridiculous with accusations against Israel, did it?

Would you prefer "patently biased" to "antisemitic"?