Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Sum of All Fears: Trump will announce a U.S.arms embargo on Ukraine, [View all]Emrys
(8,332 posts)47. You've just been corrected once on spreading misinformation. Prepare to be corrected again.
The $250+ billion you've cited is plain propaganda, and doesn't belong on this forum.
How much has the US given to Ukraine?
...
Has the United States spent $300-$350bn on Ukraine aid?
President Trump has made this claim on a number of occasions - including when he hosted France's President Macron in the White House this week.
Short answer: Figures suggest the actual spend is much lower.
BBC Verify can find no evidence to back up the claim. There are different calculations on US spending in or related to Ukraine - and they produce a much lower figure.

The Kiel Institute is a German-based think tank tracking support going into Ukraine. It calculated that the United States spent $119.7bn (£94.3bn) on aid between January 2022 and December 2024.
Others have reached a higher figure - but with a broader definition of what counts as spending on Ukraine.
The US Department of Defense has provided a figure looking at all spending on Operation Atlantic Resolve - a response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
It says $182.8bn has been "appropriated" - a figure that covers US military training in Europe and replenishment of US defence stocks.
Either way, both figures are considerably lower than claimed by the president.
We asked the White House about the basis for the $350bn claim. So far, it hasn't provided an explanation.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/crew8y7pwd5o
...
Has the United States spent $300-$350bn on Ukraine aid?
President Trump has made this claim on a number of occasions - including when he hosted France's President Macron in the White House this week.
Short answer: Figures suggest the actual spend is much lower.
BBC Verify can find no evidence to back up the claim. There are different calculations on US spending in or related to Ukraine - and they produce a much lower figure.

The Kiel Institute is a German-based think tank tracking support going into Ukraine. It calculated that the United States spent $119.7bn (£94.3bn) on aid between January 2022 and December 2024.
Others have reached a higher figure - but with a broader definition of what counts as spending on Ukraine.
The US Department of Defense has provided a figure looking at all spending on Operation Atlantic Resolve - a response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
It says $182.8bn has been "appropriated" - a figure that covers US military training in Europe and replenishment of US defence stocks.
Either way, both figures are considerably lower than claimed by the president.
We asked the White House about the basis for the $350bn claim. So far, it hasn't provided an explanation.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/crew8y7pwd5o
Even of that US spending figure, a large proportion of it never left the US, either because it was calculated on the replacement cost of antiquated materiel that was sent to Ukraine, because it was spent in US factories to produce armaments, or it's plain never been delivered despite being allocated, and if Trump has his way, quite possibly will never make it to the war zone.
The very recent article from BBC Verify quoted above continues, giving a more detailed analysis of spending on Ukraine. Here's a comparison of the US's spending with that of European countries and countries elsewhere in the world.

Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
67 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

The Sum of All Fears: Trump will announce a U.S.arms embargo on Ukraine, [View all]
speak easy
Saturday
OP
Contractors will not uphold what the CiC says. They'll continue to sell arms to NATO and/or EU countries.
ancianita
Saturday
#26
Forming Bonds Across State Lines To Accomplish Our National And Local Goals
MayReasonRule
Saturday
#15
They don't have to dissolve NATO as trump has effectively pulled us out and side with Russia.
brush
Saturday
#39
Dumpy can't unilaterally end our NATO membership, but I think I saw where rubio is planning on defunding it
PortTack
Saturday
#25
I think you are correct. I'm not sure what can be done without congress.
Dynamic Unicorn
Saturday
#37
The US provides 15.8% of Nato expenditures, not 2/3rds. The 2/3rds claim is RW disinfo.
Celerity
Saturday
#35
You've just been corrected once on spreading misinformation. Prepare to be corrected again.
Emrys
Saturday
#47
With this further clarification, I think you and I agree on these issues.
Dynamic Unicorn
Saturday
#60
I think we do in general, and yes, discussion's always good, and encourages me, at least, to stretch myself
Emrys
Saturday
#62
It's not made it to Ukraine because it or the materiel it represents has never left the US
Emrys
Saturday
#55
Ukraine does have a growing domestic drone manufacturing set-up, largely decentralized,
Emrys
Saturday
#50
I'm sure President Zelensky and all of the EU expected this. I believe that's why Zelensky was so able to keep
PortTack
Saturday
#20
Breaking - UK pledges 2.26bn to Ukraine as Zelensky says it will be used for weapons
stillcool
Saturday
#29
Wut? Just kick the US off the NATO list and there are still 31 NATO nations left.
ancianita
Saturday
#45
Seriously? Current weapons contractors will just play along, but no, they won't take rubles.
ancianita
Saturday
#46