"This isn't just bad policy. It's sabotage. It's deliberate. It's unforgivable."

[JCMach1]

13. I right away picked up on AI generated phrasing

Here is the report: This text exhibits several signs that suggest it was likely generated, at least in part, by AI:
* Overly dramatic and hyperbolic language: Phrases like "cruelty wrapped in a spreadsheet," "war on America's elderly," "fevered rant," "bureaucratic hellscape," and "Ponzi scheme" are excessively dramatic. While human writers can be passionate, AI often defaults to strong, sometimes over-the-top, language to create an impact.
* Repetitive patterns and phrasing: The text frequently repeats phrases like "sabotage strategy," "break it from the inside," and "glitch-ridden online portal." AI tends to rely on patterns and can sometimes overemphasize certain phrases.
* Simplistic and polarized portrayals: The characterizations of Trump and Musk are extremely negative and one-dimensional. The text presents them as cartoonish villains, lacking any nuance. AI often struggles with complex character portrayals and tends to rely on simplified, polarized descriptions.
* Exaggerated statistics and claims: While the text claims to present factual information, some of the statistics (e.g., millions of people over 110 receiving benefits) are presented in a way that is designed to create shock value, and are easily disproven. The combination of shock value and innacurate statistics is a red flag.
* Emotional manipulation: The text heavily relies on emotional appeals, particularly fear and outrage. It paints vivid, emotionally charged scenarios of elderly people suffering, aiming to evoke a strong emotional response. AI is often programmed to use emotional language to engage readers.
* Lack of specific, verifiable details: While the text mentions specific actions (e.g., closing field offices, cutting staff), it lacks specific, verifiable details like exact dates, locations, or sources. A human writer would likely include more concrete evidence to support their claims.
* The combination of very strong emotive language, with the lack of cited sources. A human, when writing with such strong emotional language, will often cite sources to back up their statements.
In summary, the text's excessive drama, repetitive phrasing, simplistic portrayals, and emotional manipulation strongly suggest AI involvement.
..................

Not disagreeing with the sentiment, or argument... Just end of the day there should be an open debate on DU on whether we include AI generated content.