Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AZJonnie

(2,992 posts)
2. Wow, I can't believe this article was allowed by AP's editors in this form
Sat Mar 29, 2025, 03:32 AM
Mar 2025

By that I mean normally there'd be at least 3 paragraphs tacitly implying Trump and the GOP's points are totally reasonable, before 1-2 short paragraph outlining the ACTUAL facts from any experts or people in the know (and them downplaying them as much as possible).

Guessing that someone is going to be in trouble over this article, and I doubt it remains in this form for long. It'll need a lot more IQ47 regime-approved propaganda inserted in the early lines, for sure. Words like "forcibly argued" will need toned down to "claimed", that sort of thing.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Critics see Trump attacks...»Reply #2