Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

moniss

(8,680 posts)
Wed Dec 24, 2025, 11:16 PM Dec 24

So apparently under the foreign policy doctrine of [View all]

Crumb The 1st a nation can declare sanctions against the natural resources of another country and then seize those resources while in transport on a ship and it's all perfectly legal. So if another country declares that against the US then there should be no outcry when they seize one of our ships.

Oh that's right it's about terrorism and moving drugs according to Crumb The 1st. So then the terrorism the US has supported in Central America in Nicaragua, El Salvador, etc. and the CIA running drugs and Crumb the 1st pardoning the Honduran drug kingpin so he can go back to moving more drugs qualifies under that criteria also.

So maybe a country that has had drugs come into their country from Honduras should sanction US oil and grab one of our tankers. Perfectly justified, reasonable and legal according to the foreign policy of Crumb the 1st and the fascists.

No whining now you fascists. Everybody is just playing by your same justifications.

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So apparently under the f...