General Discussion

KPN

(17,281 posts)

38. You have your opinion. I have mine. This was a big deal as

Wed Feb 25, 2026, 04:42 PM

10 hrs ago

was seeking full accountability for J6. They should have been higher priority than they ultimately were especially knowing the risk and foreseeable consequences of another run for the Presidency by the criminal in chief.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Six117 republianmushroom

56 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Top Oversight Democrat says Merrick Garland should testify on Epstein [View all] Mr. Sparkle 12 hrs ago OP

Oh BeyondGeography 12 hrs ago #1

DURec leftstreet 12 hrs ago #2

Great idea! And while they're at it, please subpoena whomever at SDNY requested NM to stop ranch investigation in 2019 SheltieLover 12 hrs ago #3

Years of silence Tetrachloride 12 hrs ago #4

Merrick Garland also has standing Mblaze 12 hrs ago #5

Lol. msfiddlestix 11 hrs ago #6

Agree. Spineless weasels like Garland never stand up for anything. BannonsLiver 10 hrs ago #19

he's trying to appear even-handed here bigtree 10 hrs ago #27

Bill Barr needs to be deposed. poli-junkie 11 hrs ago #7

Yes, Barr and Garland both need to testify FakeNoose 11 hrs ago #13

This!!!!! 👆👆👆👆👆👆👆 SheltieLover 7 hrs ago #52

Gooooood! Prairie Gates 11 hrs ago #8

🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞 Whyisthisstillclose 11 hrs ago #9

Merrick Garland would take the 5th... Escape 11 hrs ago #10

Merrick Garland has never and would never take the 5th. SunSeeker 11 hrs ago #12

Thank you. Well said Raven123 10 hrs ago #26

Epstein-related files could not be legally released during Garland's term because Maxwell's case was still under appeal bigtree 11 hrs ago #11

Here comes the Garland Society. BannonsLiver 11 hrs ago #14

There is certainly grounds for criticizing Garland for his slow prosecution of Trump, but not for this. SunSeeker 10 hrs ago #22

I've heard all those excuses and rationalizations before. BannonsLiver 10 hrs ago #24

Those are not "rationalizations" about the handling of the Epstein files, they're facts. SunSeeker 10 hrs ago #39

When Bondi threw Garland's name at Ted Lieu he didn't disagree with her premise that Garland was delinquent on Epstein BeyondGeography 9 hrs ago #41

Ted Lieu was not implying Garland should have disclosed the Epstein files. SunSeeker 8 hrs ago #44

Exactly. Thank you bigtree. He didn't want to comment because it could endanger the conviction, which was on appeal. SunSeeker 11 hrs ago #16

this expectation of some is a degeneration of norms bigtree 10 hrs ago #23

Sounds sorta like can't fight the fire until the house KPN 10 hrs ago #21

I may have a different interpretation of 'still interviewing witnesses' than you bigtree 10 hrs ago #25

There's some management tools called priorities, assignment of resources, KPN 10 hrs ago #28

none of which have been shown by anyone to have been neglected or mismanaged bigtree 10 hrs ago #31

You have your opinion. I have mine. This was a big deal as KPN 10 hrs ago #38

I literally said none was shown bigtree 9 hrs ago #42

You can't show something that is missing -- like higher priority, greater emphasis, etc. I don't isolate everything to KPN 8 hrs ago #45

we're only talking about points and processes of law. What does 'proof' have to do with all that, you say? bigtree 7 hrs ago #48

Instead of escalating and projecting -- as in "obfuscating", KPN 3 hrs ago #54

the projection here is against Garland bigtree 1 hr ago #55

Mmmhmmm. KPN 1 hr ago #56

UH OH, Escape 11 hrs ago #15

I like to call it the Garland Society. BannonsLiver 10 hrs ago #18

Yes, and isn't it amazing... Escape 8 hrs ago #46

Interesting question. BannonsLiver 7 hrs ago #49

One million files and nothing was done The Blue Flower 11 hrs ago #17

Incompetence or worse? KPN 10 hrs ago #29

Blaming Biden's DOJ is everywhere on right wing social media. progressoid 10 hrs ago #20

Lol. In some ways, I can't disagree. KPN 10 hrs ago #30

We need to have a GOOD answer to this or it will cost us in the election. Currently our answer is that Scrivener7 10 hrs ago #35

THIS. Absolutely. Shed the thin skin and blinders. KPN 8 hrs ago #47

Instead of wasting time on Garland... appmanga 10 hrs ago #32

This. Good idea. Scrivener7 10 hrs ago #34

THIS SunSeeker 9 hrs ago #40

Garland won't tell us anything. Bring on Jack Smith to talk about his investigations. Scrivener7 10 hrs ago #33

The deep of corruption in the current and former DOJ is very enlightening. Pretty obvious walkingman 10 hrs ago #36

Brilliant idea xuplate 10 hrs ago #37

Well there's at least one thing MAGAts and Dems appear to agree on MorbidButterflyTat 9 hrs ago #43

It's essentially spring in my area already. BannonsLiver 7 hrs ago #50

So should Barr!!! SheltieLover 7 hrs ago #51

AGREE ! republianmushroom 5 hrs ago #53