Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Thanks to Andy Beshear! [View all]

Dear_Prudence

(1,140 posts)
5. Touchy subject.
Wed Feb 25, 2026, 09:25 PM
8 hrs ago

I am mobility-challenged. One of my knee replacements never worked to restore function or to relieve pain. When I had to sign up for a handicapped parking sticker, I found it very stressful to have to formally embrace that designation. I have gotten used to it now. One coworker once "jokingly" called me "gimp" and another used it in a conversation I overheard. I found that term deeply offensive. In all cases, if a handicapped group prefers a certain designation, if Black people prefer capitalization, if "Eskimos" correct their name to Inuit, or so-called girls ask to be called women, I take my clues from those who are being addressed. Unless you are Black, handicapped, Inuit, or a woman, you can't know the bigotry that has been attached to the rejected terminology and labeling. I have experienced it and it leaves marks. Of course, as Beshere pointed out, sometimes the re-labeling can backfire, by minimizing the challenges faced by some group. Also, sometimes a person not familiar with the latest language update is painted as having bad intentions, which is unfortunate. Language evolves, and so must we. I worked in a library almost 50 years ago and I had to apply white-out to the subject card "Ladies Jobs" and type in "Women-Careers." And so it goes...

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Thanks to Andy Beshear!»Reply #5