Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Who is CHEYENNE HUNT, leading the charge against Swalwell? [View all]Billsdaughter
(159 posts)54. I did not make accusations about
believing or not believing any party to this mess.
Mine was a logistical discussion about making the case out the gate from either side.
We have erudite and intelligent discussions on these pages. And yes sometimes misunderstandings but never accusations such as you have made against me here.
Unclutch your pearls and check yourself, please.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I don't see how she's "leading the charge." It appears that she*, like many others in California politics, heard that a
WhiskeyGrinder
21 hrs ago
#1
A politician is making moves after news broke about another politician? Huh.
WhiskeyGrinder
21 hrs ago
#5
Oh sorry when you said "Katie Porter is leading the charge" and "a politician paid for news to be broken" I
WhiskeyGrinder
20 hrs ago
#11
Okay so what I'm hearing you say is that Katie Porter is leading a charge, and that a politician paid for news to be
WhiskeyGrinder
20 hrs ago
#17
"Bringing up something to destroy US Rep. Eric Swalwell's reputation on the eve of an important election is suspect."
WhiskeyGrinder
19 hrs ago
#25
Just fyi there are more than 1 accuser as well as family and friends corroboration in both CNN and Chronicle
Nanjeanne
19 hrs ago
#27
That's already been happening long before the staffer controversy by people holding a bitter grudge against her
SunImp
19 hrs ago
#33
She endorsed someone people around here hated so they threw her under the buss
SunImp
18 hrs ago
#42
Curious. What level or order of 'proof' would you consider sufficient to put this matter to bed?
stopdiggin
19 hrs ago
#28
Back in the day, sure. But nowadays both parties have to agree to them being used in a criminal case, and that's
WhiskeyGrinder
17 hrs ago
#44
Trump found guilty in court of sexual assault elected President of the United States,
NoMoreRepugs
19 hrs ago
#31
Nonsense! (and a bit offensive) responsible sexual behavior is NOT beyond the realm
stopdiggin
17 hrs ago
#48
in which case there would be absolutely no purpose in promoting 'asexual or saint'. Correct ?
stopdiggin
16 hrs ago
#52