Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(181,997 posts)
63. Clyburn: "I think Justice Roberts is gonna take his place alongside some other justices, like Taney
Sun May 10, 2026, 07:49 PM
May 10

Clyburn: "I think Justice Roberts is gonna take his place alongside some other justices, like Taney who gave us the Dred Scott decision"

Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2026-05-10T13:41:45.922Z

Twins. History may not repeat itself, but it sure does rhyme.

Mark Sumner 🌒 (@devilstower.bsky.social) 2026-05-07T22:42:14.146Z

6 years ago, I wrote that John Roberts, who craves to be ranked w J Marshall (or CE Hughes or E Warren) as greatest, institutionalist, consensus-building Chief Justice..
...would instead challenge Roger "Dred Scott" Taney as worst + most partisan-hack chief.

Now, no contest. Roberts beats Taney.

James Fallows (@jfallows.bsky.social) 2026-05-10T16:20:34.318Z

Chief Justice Roberts has spent his entire career trying to destroy the Voting Rights Act. He’s been trying to stop Black voting power since he worked for Reagan’s DOJ.
History will remember him as an enemy of civil rights for all Americans.
Just like CJ Taney, another white supremacist.

@bells110.bsky.social 2026-05-07T21:55:46.439Z

After 'Shelby County' 13 years ago, I wrote that John Roberts was on track to displace Roger 'Dred Scott' Taney as the Chief Justice who would live in infamy.

It's no contest any more.

Alito is a worse partisan hack, but he never pretended to be anything else. Roberts wanted to be "respected."

James Fallows (@jfallows.bsky.social) 2026-05-02T16:58:46.980Z

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That was good for a laugh stumpysbear May 6 #1
We, the public, are not the problem. C_U_L8R May 6 #2
We are too fucking stupid to understand displacedvermoter May 6 #3
Kiss my ass John, i have eyes. dem4decades May 6 #4
we didn't until you fucking HACKS came along Skittles May 6 #5
I believe this POS worked with Bush's team Stargleamer May 6 #6
FIVE REPUBLICAN-appointed justices voted to abrogate their duties niyad May 6 #18
And even more egregious is 2 of them. . . Stargleamer May 6 #26
Exactly!!!! niyad May 6 #34
Roberts, Kavanaugh and Coney-Barrett aided Bush in 2000 DemocracyForever May 8 #62
I AM free to criticize. Hey Johnny. GFY. johnnyfins May 6 #7
Don't insult us with your b.s. Roberts. Diamond_Dog May 6 #8
As a retired empiricist, I suggest Roberts take an intro course in examining data. spooky3 May 6 #9
Nailed it malaise May 6 #13
why, thank you! spooky3 May 6 #15
The data speaks for itself malaise May 6 #16
He's gaslighting, and he knows it. And corrupt to the core. nt spooky3 May 6 #17
Then there's this malaise May 6 #20
Piece of shit. nt spooky3 May 6 #21
I never forgot it malaise May 6 #23
One of his colleagues just said progressivism can't exist in the USA. In It to Win It May 6 #24
LIAR.. add that to your legacy, John Roberts. nt Cha May 6 #10
If it walks like a duck, etc. niyad May 6 #11
Or, if it gaslights like a MAGA........ wnylib May 6 #43
TRANSLATION: Klansman in robes tries to blow smoke up our bums. B.See May 6 #12
Mr Balls and strikes can go F himself. themaguffin May 6 #14
This is like saying the car dealership exists to keep your maintenance costs low bucolic_frolic May 6 #19
Not wrongly. Not wrongly. Baitball Blogger May 6 #22
He's right, we shouldn't see them as political actors Terry_M May 6 #25
Anyone reading the Writings of Alito and Thomas know that Robert's is full of it. lostincalifornia May 6 #27
Poor John thinks we are ignorant ones MagickMuffin May 6 #28
Vain racist piggy so worried how history will view him that he's telling us what to think? Attilatheblond May 6 #29
That hack can pound sand. City Lights May 6 #30
He is so full of himself - TBF May 6 #31
What a load of bullshit... appmanga May 6 #32
+1. Roberts is a virulent racist and a traitor to the Constitution dalton99a May 6 #40
They are traitors enabling a coup against our democracy. Until they are removed it will continue to get worse. Blues Heron May 6 #33
lololol Give it up, dude. You're a piece of shit. Stop trying to convince people otherwise. Solly Mack May 6 #35
Geez, he is beyond pathetic... Spazito May 6 #36
yes Skittles May 7 #59
Then maybe the court shouldn't rule as if they are political actors... haele May 6 #37
If it walks like a duck....... vapor2 May 6 #38
Political actors?? No way !! MW67 May 6 #39
Also known as whores dalton99a May 6 #41
I'm not a lawyer but the 14th amendment article # 3 explicitly said that Trump could not run again Botany May 6 #42
Not actors. usonian May 6 #44
Why were 6 justices invited to dinner with trump/king charles??? IcyPeas May 6 #45
He's telling us not to believe our lying ears and eyes. tavernier May 6 #46
I think of them more as political puppets than political actors. dgauss May 6 #47
Says the guy angrychair May 6 #48
F Him. All they do is rule on politically charged issues Bristlecone May 6 #49
The whole abortion issue canetoad May 6 #50
Sorry, JR, the Fecal Matter Has Been Conspicuously Oozing from you and Your Lying Covert for Years Now The Roux Comes First May 6 #51
More like political, racist, malfeasant actors Scalded Nun May 6 #52
"Damn! It's getting so we get called partisan hacks every fuckin time we act like partisan hacks! It's so unfair!" struggle4progress May 6 #53
He said it with a straight face ? rickford66 May 6 #54
Watch what they do, not what they say. ☮ walkingman May 6 #55
Yeah well, get glasses Johnny Bob. Dave Bowman May 6 #56
Hated the VRA since the early 80s? moondust May 7 #57
Thanks to RW SCOTUS justices... Jacson6 May 7 #58
Anybody who is Federalist Society is anti-American. valleyrogue May 7 #60
MaddowBlog-Why John Roberts' defense of the Supreme Court was so wildly unpersuasive LetMyPeopleVote May 7 #61
Clyburn: "I think Justice Roberts is gonna take his place alongside some other justices, like Taney LetMyPeopleVote May 10 #63
Lying phony justice says corrupt liars are not liars Mysterian May 10 #64
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chief Justice John Robert...»Reply #63