Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

scipan

(3,102 posts)
6. here are their arguments
Mon May 11, 2026, 08:26 PM
Monday
A stay is warranted because the decision by the Supreme Court of Virginia is deeply mistaken on two critical issues of federal law with profound practical importance to the Nation. The decision below violates federal law in two separate ways. First, it predicated its interpretation of the Virginia Constitution on a grave misreading of federal law, which expressly fixes a single day for the “election” of Representatives and Delegates to Congress…Second, by rejecting the plain text of the Virginia Constitution’s definition of the term “election” to adopt its own contrary meaning, the Supreme Court of Virginia ‘transgressed the ordinary bounds of judicial review such that it arrogated to itself the power vested in the state legislature to regulate federal elections.'”
Snip...
ordinary bounds of judicial review.”
“The window for orderly administration of Virginia’s congressional elections is closing rapidly. This Court should act now to preserve the status quo while it considers the grave federal questions the decision below raises.”


https://bluevirginia.us/2026/05/va-democrats-emergency-application-to-the-u-s-supreme-court-argues-va-supreme-courts-decision-was-deeply-mistaken-violates-federal-law-in-two-separate-ways/

Sounds to me like they have a good argument. Maybe it will work.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Democrats Ask Supreme Cou...»Reply #6