Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fiendish Thingy

(24,053 posts)
13. They already have a mandatory retirement age of 73
Mon May 11, 2026, 08:37 PM
Monday

Which I presume is legal.

The law you quoted says “refuse to hire or discharge”; discharge is not the same as mandatory retirement, especially if that mandatory retirement comes with all the benefits retirees are entitled to.

Like I said, I didn’t just make it up, there are a number of legal experts discussing this strategy.

If I can find any of the sources I encountered, I will post links.

I think one of the sources may have been someone at the Lawfare blog - they know their stuff.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Virginia Democrats have f...»Reply #13