Announcements
In reply to the discussion: We have made an adjustment to DU's "No bigotry/insensitivity" rule: please read [View all]Karma13612
(4,713 posts)Hi, I was just alerted to jury duty here (Jun 23) and it was on this very topic of Bigotry.
I accepted the responsibility of serving as I always do, until I can see the meat of the conflict thru the posts that are provided.
I have a suggestion to make to the administrators or the individuals who create the format for jury service.
This specific jury service/conflict was around Christianity and bigotry. It was delving into subjects which I am just not at all comfortable debating. As a result, I selected the option to exit out of jury service. I appreciate that option.
BUT, I would very much like to ask for the ability to give my reason for exiting without completing my service. Is there a way to allow the jury service participant to give a quick comment as to why they are exiting the service and not giving a verdict.
My comment for todays situation would have been:
I am not well enough versed in Christianity to fully appreciate what is at issue and to decide if the poster was being bigotted.
I hope the Administrators could provide us the option (strictly voluntary) to provide a reason for us exiting out of the service without giving a verdict. And also, if feasible, to even give a reason for how we voted if we did go thru with giving our verdict. Again, it could be an option, but not required.
Thanks everyone and have a great day.
Of course, those of us in NY State, might still be licking our wounds considering what SCOTUS just decided in The Rifle Association vs Bruen case. I live in NY and am feeling decidedly less safe now.