Announcements

PJMcK

(23,126 posts)

10. K&R for great plans

Wed Jun 8, 2016, 11:25 AM

Jun 2016

Thanks to Skinner, EarlG, Elad and all the other administrators for constantly making this one of the best political websites.

Count me in if you need testers for the new software.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

525 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

DU General Election Season Begins Soon: What You Need To Know [View all] Skinner Jun 2016 OP

kick & recommended. William769 Jun 2016 #1

Nothing will make me forgive Dr. Strange. Nothing. Orrex Jun 2016 #2

A big K&R---Time to kick in some more money to DU. trumad Jun 2016 #3

This sounds good. DCBob Jun 2016 #4

Enormous K & R. Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #5

KNR Lucinda Jun 2016 #6

Halle-fucking-lujah! DU will once again be the ... 11 Bravo Jun 2016 #7

At the expense of the UNDERGROUND. Hissyspit Jun 2016 #471

Sounds good. I hope it works well! mean it. boston bean Jun 2016 #8

Yes. nt msanthrope Jun 2016 #17

+1000 gollygee Jun 2016 #33

It's always baffled me that it was never there. NYC Liberal Jun 2016 #46

Yes it does... Phentex Jun 2016 #74

That's a very uncharitable suggestion of all the people who choose not to or cannot pay. AtheistCrusader Jun 2016 #211

Just trolls... Phentex Jun 2016 #216

People used to buy others a star in the past. Usually if the person was a valued member who kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #276

Any donation buys you a star BainsBane Jun 2016 #294

It doesn't even do that. AtheistCrusader Jun 2016 #352

I don't have extra $$ to donate to DU like I used to. I don't appreciate the assumption auntAgonist Jun 2016 #521

Totally agree BooScout Jun 2016 #194

YUP.... +++++ hlthe2b Jun 2016 #202

Plus a billion on the sexism, it's about time. bettyellen Jun 2016 #252

Yes, + another billion. Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #306

Ready! ucrdem Jun 2016 #9

K&R for great plans PJMcK Jun 2016 #10

Thank you. And I hope there will be a big ass link to the rules page at the start of each forum! Native Jun 2016 #11

I'm in! Loki Jun 2016 #12

Thanks, benevolent overlord! UrbScotty Jun 2016 #13

Major K&R EileenFB Jun 2016 #14

How about reading the rules mountain grammy Jun 2016 #36

Your winner/whiner thing will have to go. panader0 Jun 2016 #77

I think they have til June 16th. MH1 Jun 2016 #213

I hate those bugs (n/t) PJMcK Jun 2016 #236

Taken care of EileenFB Jun 2016 #293

I'm a Hillary supporter and I don't like that sig pic either. Lisa0825 Jun 2016 #166

I have to agree. It only serves to drive the people we need away from our party and candidate. kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #278

Excellent. A lot of effort and thought went into this. Thank you. nt msanthrope Jun 2016 #15

Thank you Skinner. Some much-needed rule changes here. NYC Liberal Jun 2016 #16

That's the plan. Skinner Jun 2016 #61

Thanks. NYC Liberal Jun 2016 #70

The flaw is that some people here are 'organized' and they will keep alerting on a post -none Jun 2016 #303

The reactionaries won. sulphurdunn Jun 2016 #354

a conservative female won the primary Doctor_J Jun 2016 #377

Shes liberal squirecam Jun 2016 #380

. Doctor_J Jun 2016 #384

By your standards Bernie would be a conservative as well. Lumping Hillary in redstateblues Jun 2016 #427

Will you support Clinton when she agitates for war with Iran? Ikonoklast Jun 2016 #476

Maybe some of them do. chwaliszewski Jun 2016 #478

New Democrats love foreign wars and intervention in conflicts having nothing to do with us. Ikonoklast Jun 2016 #489

If they are shot down unanimously, as one would expect to be the case if it is totally frivolous, Nitram Jun 2016 #88

I think it sounds pretty good. nt BootinUp Jun 2016 #18

Thank goodness! PatSeg Jun 2016 #19

Yes, some true colors were surely shown and will not be forgotten. nt ChisolmTrailDem Jun 2016 #267

I'd like to think I'll remember OriginalGeek Jun 2016 #347

Wow, this all looks pretty great. auntpurl Jun 2016 #20

Agreed. spooky3 Jun 2016 #47

Because we have come to view it as a catalyst for forum drama. Skinner Jun 2016 #69

Fair enough. auntpurl Jun 2016 #75

There is such a rule--included in the "Content" section above: tblue37 Jun 2016 #114

But you have included a rule forbidding jurors to post those results, so tblue37 Jun 2016 #109

We learned from the years when we had rules... Skinner Jun 2016 #118

Skinner, if the posting of Jury Results was alert-able violation - we'd quickly learn not to do it. vkkv Jun 2016 #165

I have to agree. auntpurl Jun 2016 #263

i agree with you all. phylny Jun 2016 #376

I agree. JudyM Jun 2016 #357

Agreed. snot Jun 2016 #447

I would be less inclined to pay for a star in order to serve on juries if... ChisolmTrailDem Jun 2016 #272

I understand your point about not publishing the results mentalsolstice Jun 2016 #173

I just took myself off the willing to serve. If I can't find out what happened.... trueblue2007 Jun 2016 #519

I just served on a jury for the 1st time under new rules, totally unsatisfying! mentalsolstice Jun 2016 #520

Your new approach to jury duty will make me willing to serve again. dixiegrrrrl Jun 2016 #177

Guilty... Agschmid Jun 2016 #305

I also like to know whether I am an outlier or not. tblue37 Jun 2016 #102

My first reaction was not to like this too but I think in the new incarnation of the jury system it stevenleser Jun 2016 #197

Well, we will see how it works. I have never liked not knowing the outcome of tblue37 Jun 2016 #203

Yes, in psychology we call it "observer drift" or "observer bias" auntpurl Jun 2016 #260

That caught my eye as well. Chemisse Jun 2016 #394

So "BernieBros" and "BoB" meets a welcome demise on the 16th. Thank you. Miles Archer Jun 2016 #21

Just to clarify, I mean the nicknames, not the supporters. Miles Archer Jun 2016 #67

Yes, disrespectful nicknames are not permitted. (nt) Skinner Jun 2016 #72

thanks squirecam Jun 2016 #383

Who decides what's disrespectful? baldguy Jun 2016 #444

Sounds like a plan skinner. Good job. applegrove Jun 2016 #22

That must have been a great deal of work for Elad! Good luck with this, I really hope it works MADem Jun 2016 #23

God dammit, I guess I finally have to get a star... Godhumor Jun 2016 #24

The winning change... onehandle Jun 2016 #25

I can live with this ahimsa Jun 2016 #174

High five Peachhead22 Jun 2016 #412

Verbatim lupinella Jun 2016 #484

Been here over a year DVRacer Jun 2016 #429

This excellent news calls for some dancing... stevenleser Jun 2016 #26

says something about me that my first thot irisblue Jun 2016 #375

Sounds good, a lot of us can do better individually, and we can all do better collectively nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #27

That's a lot of work that went into this sharp_stick Jun 2016 #28

K&R! stonecutter357 Jun 2016 #29

It looks like you are taking all the fun out of serving on a jury. Tobin S. Jun 2016 #30

Agreed--to the serious part! spooky3 Jun 2016 #40

~ Kicked & Recommended ~ In_The_Wind Jun 2016 #31

I do a lot of SQA IRL if you need help. AND I get the cast off my hand today so I can be effective!! PeaceNikki Jun 2016 #32

I'll bet you are looking forward to that!! brer cat Jun 2016 #273

"The privilege to serve on a Jury ...active Star membership." That's beautiful, man. n/t jtuck004 Jun 2016 #34

How many of us go "star-less", waiting to purchase hearts? JustABozoOnThisBus Jun 2016 #355

"No kooky...content"? That's my go to. Oh well, ok. NightWatcher Jun 2016 #35

I think the Lounge may still accept non-political kooky content. Don't lose hope! LonePirate Jun 2016 #120

On personal attacks... Gormy Cuss Jun 2016 #37

Don't know. Skinner Jun 2016 #78

That percent of active posters may change after the 16th, Gormy. dixiegrrrrl Jun 2016 #84

A lot are leaving and going to be leaving too after the treatment they've gotten here by... ChisolmTrailDem Jun 2016 #279

Long time ago I learned I did not have to bite every fishhook around. dixiegrrrrl Jun 2016 #364

A-yup. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2016 #500

Overall I say the changes should be good. I'm looking forward to your tweaks too. LiberalFighter Jun 2016 #38

Great, but I have one suggestion: spooky3 Jun 2016 #39

Agree; I posted this above. auntpurl Jun 2016 #44

Yes--it appears several of us agree. spooky3 Jun 2016 #45

Me three Nitram Jun 2016 #94

I also agree. montana_hazeleyes Jun 2016 #195

I also agree. femmocrat Jun 2016 #148

Don't you think one would be able to determine if they were off base or not notadmblnd Jun 2016 #285

I like knowing the explanations, and whether it was 6-1 vs 4-3 for example. spooky3 Jun 2016 #392

From what I read there'll no longer be an opportunity for comments when adjudicating offensive posts notadmblnd Jun 2016 #408

If you'll check my earlier posts, I (and others) suggested that spooky3 Jun 2016 #414

well I feel there will be no benefit from letting people post their judgemental remarks notadmblnd Jun 2016 #415

The notification gives you a link back to what was judicated mentalsolstice Jun 2016 #393

That would require that you go search for that thread and that post. Chemisse Jun 2016 #397

You are provided a link to the post when you are asked to perform jury service notadmblnd Jun 2016 #406

This message was self-deleted by its author arikara Jun 2016 #100

I agree with that too Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #106

I learn from reading others' opinions as well. nt Ilsa Jun 2016 #168

This message was self-deleted by its author totodeinhere Jun 2016 #231

Not only do I agree, but even if it was left alone, the poster needs to know Reter Jun 2016 #442

Skinner has previously stated that this would freak out the poster. athena Jun 2016 #455

Thank you, Admins! The new DU rules look very promising! BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #41

Sounds like the DU I remember - the one I became addicted to liberal N proud Jun 2016 #42

"Don't start threads in the wrong forum or group" etherealtruth Jun 2016 #43

^^Good question^^^ Bobbie Jo Jun 2016 #59

We will still have hosts. Skinner Jun 2016 #80

Thanks, Skinner! greatauntoftriplets Jun 2016 #48

It looks good. Thanks for the hard work to make this place better. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #49

Thank you for letting us know where we stand Marrah_G Jun 2016 #50

TL:DR progressoid Jun 2016 #51

I found it sometimes helpful to evaulate posts in-thread ... Auggie Jun 2016 #52

Jurors will still get the necessary context. Skinner Jun 2016 #81

I like all the changes except one. the one about the star requirement. Exilednight Jun 2016 #53

I think it's to show commitment to the website. auntpurl Jun 2016 #56

I agree. Exilednight Jun 2016 #64

Good news is that now you can get a star for a dollar. dixiegrrrrl Jun 2016 #223

We cannot buy stars for someone else anymore. dixiegrrrrl Jun 2016 #188

Oh, I didn't know that. auntpurl Jun 2016 #192

Not directly, but you could paypal them some $ for the purpose. stevenleser Jun 2016 #200

Prior to the required "subscription" model, DUers dis buy stars for other people. Miles Archer Jun 2016 #517

Serving on juries is a privilege. Skinner Jun 2016 #92

So providing content ... Delver Rootnose Jun 2016 #175

Also the 1000+ post requirement,though The Green Manalishi Jun 2016 #229

Well I'd be off... Delver Rootnose Jun 2016 #243

The world will continue to turn without me. The Green Manalishi Jun 2016 #249

Won't matter much to me.... Delver Rootnose Jun 2016 #259

Got to make up for the loss of all the "Berniebros" revenue somehow right? truebrit71 Jun 2016 #265

You do realize.... Delver Rootnose Jun 2016 #277

You do realize truebrit71 Jun 2016 #280

Trolls aren't dropping $20 to become members Renew Deal Jun 2016 #297

You can get a star for $1. truebrit71 Jun 2016 #316

And give up your real name, real email address, etc. Renew Deal Jun 2016 #325

Sold out! SouthernDemLinda Jun 2016 #321

"Providing content?" That seems like a high handed way of saying MADem Jun 2016 #504

Seems to me Curmudgeoness Jun 2016 #438

Yeah, I mean, I'm not a star member, but I'm also not that concerned about serving on juries... kjones Jun 2016 #98

Good idea - those non-star members who have to face the advertising on this site are still playing vkkv Jun 2016 #186

Is there any minimum price to get a star? Renew Deal Jun 2016 #295

Outstanding! Bobbie Jo Jun 2016 #54

I might need a 'sarcasm shield' of some kind for my posts. fleabiscuit Jun 2016 #55

Well i hope the new rules help and i promise to try to do better. hrmjustin Jun 2016 #57

I have one quick question. herding cats Jun 2016 #58

If you find the post after you are finished with jury service... Skinner Jun 2016 #93

It's not a big deal anyway herding cats Jun 2016 #172

what you just said seems contrary to what you said upthread: dixiegrrrrl Jun 2016 #204

To clarify Skinner Jun 2016 #217

I take it that ends grave-dancing and terms like DINO Maeve Jun 2016 #60

Hey hey, look at my shiny new star! auntpurl Jun 2016 #62

I find the 1000 post rule notemason Jun 2016 #63

Agreed. "Star members who have been members for a year and have at least 100 posts" Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #154

Thank you. notemason Jun 2016 #178

Yaaaay! FINALLY!!!!! This is long overdue. nt AgadorSparticus Jun 2016 #65

Kicked and recommended! Thank you Skinner and admin team... Firebrand Gary Jun 2016 #66

I know how you feel, Gary. calimary Jun 2016 #513

So... we're to shut up and bow our heads.. modestybl Jun 2016 #68

You managed to get pretty much the opposite of what Skinner was saying. nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #115

I understand we are not to criticize Dem candidates from here on out... modestybl Jun 2016 #130

Here's a good example. "I don't agree with Bernie's characterization of his history of support or stevenleser Jun 2016 #176

Thank you. This is a very good example of criticism vs bashing. uppityperson Jun 2016 #282

Another example please? SouthernDemLinda Jun 2016 #334

Sure, I dont agree with Bernie supporters characterization of the email investigation. stevenleser Jun 2016 #348

Calling out bad policies, losing strategies, corruption and outright lying has always been permitted Renew Deal Jun 2016 #300

Nope, this is different: Hissyspit Jun 2016 #472

No, he's asking you/us to STOP being the Dem version of Free Republic. n/t Lil Missy Jun 2016 #512

This change: Alerters and Jurors will no longer receive notifications after Jury service is complete vkkv Jun 2016 #71

I agree. It's useful & informative to see the results. n/t 99th_Monkey Jun 2016 #179

Thirded (n/t) Jon Ace Jun 2016 #399

That combined with the 1,000 post rule marle35 Jun 2016 #480

Thank you Skinner, it looks good passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #73

That's an excellent idea. Amimnoch Jun 2016 #99

+1. nt tblue37 Jun 2016 #144

I agree. femmocrat Jun 2016 #167

Posts should be able to reference RW pages when demolishing them or posting excerpts as examples. Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2016 #183

That does not change my request passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #222

A list might be good. & Skinner posted the rule which shows that RW links OK in the way I suggest. Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2016 #245

After I posted, Skinner replied to someone else that there won't be a list passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #269

What is Right wing or not, seems to depend on who posted the link and -none Jun 2016 #323

We've had a rash of articles posted from THE HILL passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #349

Totally agreed Peachhead22 Jun 2016 #419

Thirded. charlyvi Jun 2016 #210

No. That makes it too easy to troll ecstatic Jun 2016 #266

I like this suggestion. musicblind Jun 2016 #497

Thank you! mcar Jun 2016 #76

Understood. lpbk2713 Jun 2016 #79

Does "No divisive group attacks" mean no discussion of Third Way vs. traditional Democrats? senz Jun 2016 #82

It serves the Third Way to deny the existence of any distinction. JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #242

You will stop using this photo after 16th hertopos Jun 2016 #413

To whom? senz Jun 2016 #423

Calling anyone you disagree with third way is an insult . Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #435

You have to pay to be on a jury? Kentonio Jun 2016 #83

Generally, don't you find that free things and opportunities are less appreciated? Plus, vkkv Jun 2016 #97

Yes. Just like the nominee. Pay to play. truebrit71 Jun 2016 #286

I like "Don't bash Democratic public figures". Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #85

+10^10^100 stevenleser Jun 2016 #122

"May not be loved" hueymahl Jun 2016 #149

I agree with hueymahl and this concerns me too. aquamarina Jun 2016 #238

Agree 100% workinclasszero Jun 2016 #190

So, what's legitimate criticism versus "bashing" Democratic public figures? All those names deserve leveymg Jun 2016 #209

Take Rahm Emanuel as an example. I would vote to hide this post on the grounds of "bashing": Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #261

Reasonable. leveymg Jun 2016 #319

That's easy. Dr Hobbitstein Jun 2016 #287

+1. "Hillary should not have voted for the IWR" Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #298

Exactly. Nt Dr Hobbitstein Jun 2016 #304

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #335

Agree, those are easy cases. But, it's the hard cases that are the problem, and leveymg Jun 2016 #327

"Hard cases" will probably end up with 4-3 jury decisions, one way or the other. Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #371

The 'first amendment' is only a protection from the government. (As are all the BoR rights.) X_Digger Jun 2016 #458

+1 brer cat Jun 2016 #281

Yea, no more holding our own's feet to the fire or calling out authoritarian and right-wing... ChisolmTrailDem Jun 2016 #296

There have to be some exceptions Reter Jun 2016 #443

These changes look good, thanks Skinner, EarlG and Elad... Spazito Jun 2016 #86

The civility and political rules are clear and forceful as phrased. tblue37 Jun 2016 #87

Does "the portion of the thread relevant to the alerted post" mean all posts in the 'ancestral line' muriel_volestrangler Jun 2016 #89

The entire "ancestral line." Skinner Jun 2016 #103

Yikes, you probably won't have too many posting on here from June until Nov. glowing Jun 2016 #90

I'm concerned about this also hueymahl Jun 2016 #163

See my #176 above. Skinner please feel free to correct me if I am off. nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #180

"write in" SouthernDemLinda Jun 2016 #308

+1 ! FailureToCommunicate Jun 2016 #411

Tiny Dreams vs. Tiny Hands valerief Jun 2016 #431

l look at it differently Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #439

I live in FL and we still have primaries in August for state and local races. glowing Jun 2016 #453

K&R! DemonGoddess Jun 2016 #91

Thanks. Can't wait. K&R L. Coyote Jun 2016 #95

Not sure I understand the point of the "gradation" of jury choices. morningfog Jun 2016 #96

The purpose of the gradation of jury choices... Skinner Jun 2016 #113

You could always retain the comments as.... Delver Rootnose Jun 2016 #199

Looks good. I'm sure there will be refinements, too, MineralMan Jun 2016 #101

Sounds like a successful plan. Thanks for your efforts. oasis Jun 2016 #104

A couple of questions regarding hidden posts: George II Jun 2016 #105

Answers. Skinner Jun 2016 #136

See ya after the 16th pengu Jun 2016 #107

Not having folks like you claim everyone they disagree with is a paid Brock shill is worth doubling stevenleser Jun 2016 #129

Ok? pengu Jun 2016 #132

You, apparently. You cared enough to respond. nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #134

smh pengu Jun 2016 #143

How can we miss you charlyvi Jun 2016 #381

Unfair I was taking a drink when I scrolled down lol DVRacer Jun 2016 #452

See ya, upaloopa Jun 2016 #151

The thought police... SouthernDemLinda Jun 2016 #331

This is great news. I came to DU in 2001 to support Democrats. OKNancy Jun 2016 #108

Yes!!! Man, it will feel so good for DU to be DU again. Lyric Jun 2016 #110

Very cool. Liking the sound of the new jury system. Politicub Jun 2016 #111

Bravo! ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #112

Caution Wibly Jun 2016 #116

This is not the Democratic party this is an owner operated web site. Don't bash Democrats here upaloopa Jun 2016 #138

It's going to be just like the talk! SouthernDemLinda Jun 2016 #374

I notice that about 98% of the recs to this announcement are members of the HRC group. panader0 Jun 2016 #117

Don't you have your jack shit or something other web site to keep bashing Hillary? Go there upaloopa Jun 2016 #121

I don't think insulting posts like yours will be allowed under the new rules. panader0 Jun 2016 #126

What's insulting. You have your Hillary bashing web site call Jack something upaloopa Jun 2016 #133

"jack shit" is insulting. panader0 Jun 2016 #159

I don't quite understand how the jack website survives now Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #437

Your use of the phrase "HRC worship" is noteworthy too. NurseJackie Jun 2016 #150

When no critcism is allowed--what do you call it? panader0 Jun 2016 #171

a lot of people will have to learn the relevant differences between criticism and name-calling LanternWaste Jun 2016 #208

I believe the names like "HRC worship" came about All in it together Jun 2016 #314

"jack shit" website is a snotty cheap shot sgainst progressive Dems AntiBank Jun 2016 #292

As near as I can tell, it's a website that exists for the sole purpose of taking pot-shots ... NurseJackie Jun 2016 #366

Whether you realize it, you've just described the troll-haven Rob H. Jun 2016 #402

That's not a site that I visit. If you see someone touting it or encouraging defection ... NurseJackie Jun 2016 #405

As near as I can tell, Curmudgeoness Jun 2016 #440

Sure. NurseJackie Jun 2016 #445

Probably because we have been the targets of most of the nastiness here. stevenleser Jun 2016 #157

the targets of most of the nastiness here. AlbertCat Jun 2016 #215

The objections to the civility rules from one corner is evidence enough. nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #225

ridiculous narcissism AntiBank Jun 2016 #302

The objections to the new civility rules from one corner is evidence enough. nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #307

I am not objecting in the slightest, simply saying it's a 2 way street AntiBank Jun 2016 #320

You are not the only Bernie supporter here. You mentioned narcissism? nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #329

I never claimed I was, nor that I spoke for them. AntiBank Jun 2016 #333

Bear in mind Newsmax, where you appear isn't going to be on the approved sources last... truebrit71 Jun 2016 #361

Sure it will as it will when I appear on Fox. You are twisting Skinners rules stevenleser Jun 2016 #367

You first... truebrit71 Jun 2016 #372

Well, I voted for Bernie yesterday The Green Manalishi Jun 2016 #248

Of course melman Jun 2016 #426

Good to see. How about not letting people use Polls to create an "enemies list". mackdaddy Jun 2016 #119

long overdue. the rules system worked very well, the jury system has proven quite flawed unblock Jun 2016 #123

Jurors will be able to see the context. Skinner Jun 2016 #131

ah, brilliant. unblock Jun 2016 #142

A quibble about context for alerted post unc70 Jun 2016 #389

K & R and thank you for your hard work! nt femmocrat Jun 2016 #124

So paying members will sit in judgement of us all. No thanks and buh bye. CBGLuthier Jun 2016 #125

Bye and remember the thing about the door on the way out. upaloopa Jun 2016 #128

These changes seem like a move in the right direction. Thanks! LonePirate Jun 2016 #127

You don't know how correct you actually are. -none Jun 2016 #340

Thank you - good job stevil Jun 2016 #135

Lots of positive changes here. Decoy of Fenris Jun 2016 #137

QUESTION: Will "Jury Blacklists" be eliminated too? (nt) NurseJackie Jun 2016 #139

Not sure. Skinner Jun 2016 #146

I think the blacklists prevent a lot of stalking... bettyellen Jun 2016 #256

^^^This^^^ -none Jun 2016 #341

With the new rules, let them, they will lose their juror privileges. I may empty my blacklist stevenleser Jun 2016 #360

Now this sounds like a plan! BooScout Jun 2016 #140

With the move to GE standing, will Admin permit User Name changes now or after November? . . . Journeyman Jun 2016 #141

We do not have plans to do so at this time. (nt) Skinner Jun 2016 #153

Q: where is the list of prohibited right-wing publications, authors, or pundits? john978 Jun 2016 #145

There is no list. Skinner Jun 2016 #152

But what if it is accurate.... Delver Rootnose Jun 2016 #185

The rule says Skinner Jun 2016 #187

And you risk being alerted... Delver Rootnose Jun 2016 #207

And the new jury rules say the admins can overrule a jury's decision. stevenleser Jun 2016 #246

And I'm betting it won't.... Delver Rootnose Jun 2016 #258

I agree with your analysis - seems DU wants to be the definition of establishment. nt john978 Jun 2016 #301

I wonder if Fox news employees are allowed to post here Doctor_J Jun 2016 #432

{{{snort}}} Oh no you didn't!!! eom Purveyor Jun 2016 #436

Oh good now Joe Lieberman..... Delver Rootnose Jun 2016 #147

Joe Lieberman did become an "Independent" and was elected Senator running against a Democrat. n/t PoliticAverse Jun 2016 #191

It seems from your posts in this thread that you have issues with the new rules, and that is fine, still_one Jun 2016 #353

The operative ...... Delver Rootnose Jun 2016 #400

A democratic party supporting DU once more! workinclasszero Jun 2016 #155

Skinner, what about locks aquired during the primary process, will they reset back to 0? Logical Jun 2016 #156

Probably. Skinner Jun 2016 #161

I hope that is it, the trouble makers will get 5 soon enough. Thanks for all you do! Nt Logical Jun 2016 #201

I am sorry if someone asked and I missed it but are you implimenting the 5 hide rule like hrmjustin Jun 2016 #158

We will have a stopgap that will flag people who get five hides or more. (nt) Skinner Jun 2016 #164

Thanks. hrmjustin Jun 2016 #170

So, when do we get the GD-General election forum opened??? I'm ready to bash some trump! Amimnoch Jun 2016 #160

Oh my god that is so disturbing. auntpurl Jun 2016 #214

It is extremely disturbing isn't it... Amimnoch Jun 2016 #218

K&R nt ProudProgressiveNow Jun 2016 #162

I am glad to see awoke_in_2003 Jun 2016 #169

Problem with graphic content and context rule unc70 Jun 2016 #396

There should be a new LBN rule Omaha Steve Jun 2016 #181

No kooky, how about wacky? j/k n/t hibbing Jun 2016 #182

I agree with everything, except for "Alerters and Jurors will no longer receive notifications after lunamagica Jun 2016 #184

I agree Blue Idaho Jun 2016 #284

I'll miss serving on juries, but the changes look good -- I have no beef with them. Thanks! . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2016 #189

I don't understand the rationale for the 4 options (jury) and how Ilsa Jun 2016 #193

Sounds good! yardwork Jun 2016 #196

"Civility begets quality discussions" wildeyed Jun 2016 #198

Will we still be able to call AngryAmish an asshole? AngryAmish Jun 2016 #205

Post Olympic spoilers and see what happens... Phentex Jun 2016 #227

I like the proposed changes... nice job! InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2016 #206

Kick treestar Jun 2016 #212

So nobody can call me a Republican Troll or an uneducated voter again :-) redstatebluegirl Jun 2016 #219

Skinner: honest question katsy Jun 2016 #220

We believe that these rules do not disallow any good-faith discussion of issues. Skinner Jun 2016 #228

That's where my confusion lay. katsy Jun 2016 #264

Thank you, Elad and all other admins for your thoughtful work. ancianita Jun 2016 #221

Agree, agree. A breath of fresh air SCantiGOP Jun 2016 #224

Thank you, Skinner. TygrBright Jun 2016 #226

The votes are tallied as a binary Yes/No Skinner Jun 2016 #232

ah, OK, got that. TygrBright Jun 2016 #239

Back to where Democrats support Democrats. What a relief!! demosincebirth Jun 2016 #230

Amazing concept, no? stevenleser Jun 2016 #233

Yup. demosincebirth Jun 2016 #244

and where liberals are persona non grata Doctor_J Jun 2016 #382

Ahh, I can hardly wait for June 16th...like a kid waiting for demosincebirth Jun 2016 #430

........... desmiller Jun 2016 #234

What are "Transparency pages"? thanks n/t left-of-center2012 Jun 2016 #235

It shows your hidden posts. Skinner Jun 2016 #237

Thanks for the comedy! nolabels Jun 2016 #240

This is an excellent start, thank you very much steve2470 Jun 2016 #241

So apparently there will still be no penalty... NaturalHigh Jun 2016 #247

Not correct. Skinner Jun 2016 #250

Oh. Thanks for clarifying that. NaturalHigh Jun 2016 #251

Skinner- A possible suggestion for future consideration on the "jury results" issue. TygrBright Jun 2016 #253

Yet you will change nothing on DI? Where homophobia/etc stands (against TOS), anyone can serve, etc? The Straight Story Jun 2016 #254

Question: Kelvin Mace Jun 2016 #255

this is why squirecam Jun 2016 #387

I am sorry, was I speaking to you? Kelvin Mace Jun 2016 #407

Criticism does not mean insults. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #492

"registered for at least one year - more than 1,000 posts - active Star membership" -- 2 out of 3 ? eppur_se_muova Jun 2016 #257

Sounds good annabanana Jun 2016 #262

Everything looks good but I have a question. IrishEyes Jun 2016 #268

That is correct, but... Skinner Jun 2016 #271

Kinda defeats... ymetca Jun 2016 #270

Thank heavens! tallahasseedem Jun 2016 #274

Well, Most of This I Dig ProfessorGAC Jun 2016 #275

This sounds good! brer cat Jun 2016 #283

I hope every criticism of Hillary isn't labelled sexist and flagged as such adigal Jun 2016 #288

I think... c-ville rook Jun 2016 #289

Comments and concerns Behind the Aegis Jun 2016 #290

BtA, I have to say I agree with much of your post. Especially the part about transparency and seaglass Jun 2016 #344

This concern ^^^ Ms. Toad Jun 2016 #404

In an ideal world, alerts regarding bigotry would be sent to jurors from the group in question. stevenleser Jun 2016 #416

I think you're personally taking on a lot of grief Renew Deal Jun 2016 #291

The appeals process is going to be a huge pain in the ass for the admins. Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #390

Out of curiosity...could you please comment on... xocet Jun 2016 #299

So DU is going to start supporting Democrats IronLionZion Jun 2016 #309

It's PUPPIES!!! warrprayer Jun 2016 #310

K&R gademocrat7 Jun 2016 #311

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #312

Love the new Jury System RockaFowler Jun 2016 #313

bookmarked lovemydog Jun 2016 #315

Presumptive nominee is not the nomiee Geronimoe Jun 2016 #317

No one is forcing you to support anyone. leftofcool Jun 2016 #330

Here is the link Geronimoe Jun 2016 #449

Thank You Skinner! Blue Idaho Jun 2016 #318

You'd better get a good lawyer!!! pamela Jun 2016 #322

lol Renew Deal Jun 2016 #326

Uh oh, that's 101 now... FSogol Jun 2016 #362

good, lets get on with supporting democrats MFM008 Jun 2016 #324

I appreciate all the work you guys one_voice Jun 2016 #328

Is there any way we could have a rule tavernier Jun 2016 #332

K&R !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! n/t RKP5637 Jun 2016 #336

Suggestion re: Jury time frames Algernon Moncrieff Jun 2016 #337

Enhhh... There've been times when I accepted a jury invite when browsing on my phone ... NurseJackie Jun 2016 #369

I'll admit there have been a few when I had to go look at the thread to get context. Algernon Moncrieff Jun 2016 #451

Curious as to why, rather than instuting these rules earlier, you opted for a free for all cui bono Jun 2016 #338

I know some of you Sanders supporters believe this, I just can't see how you can delude yourself stevenleser Jun 2016 #343

If that were true, then all the more reason to enact the rules earlier so as not to show bias. cui bono Jun 2016 #420

Keep pretending you didn't control the juries and the overall tenor on DU. stevenleser Jun 2016 #421

LOL! Yes, THAT'S why JPR was created. WE WANT TOTAL CONTROL!!! cui bono Jun 2016 #424

You can call yourselves whatever you want, it's what you did. nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #425

I forgot to mention what you did. Posted one of the two most vile OPs in DU history. cui bono Jun 2016 #465

I'm Jewish, so no, I posted nothing anti-semitic. Nice try though. nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #482

So? Another DUer who is a PoC posted a racist's rant and an anti-semitic post. cui bono Jun 2016 #494

You made the allegation, you provide the link. nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #499

1. We all know that's against the rules. 2. I'm no longer a star member so search is useless. cui bono Jun 2016 #505

I'm so glad you raised all of this nonsense. I've been waiting for the opportunity. stevenleser Jun 2016 #514

I think you just got your rear handed to you. nt msanthrope Jun 2016 #515

Results... Major Nikon Jun 2016 #483

Thanks. cui bono Jun 2016 #507

"Progressives" who wanted to be able to JTFrog Jun 2016 #481

"The worst offenders were Sanders supporters?" I just can't see how you can delude yourself. Miles Archer Jun 2016 #518

This post is spot on. Capt. Obvious Jun 2016 #474

Kudos to you! Good start. One small point . . . . Stinky The Clown Jun 2016 #339

Question on "Don't bash Democratic public figures"... backscatter712 Jun 2016 #342

Thank you, Skinner. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #345

I appreciate the effort but do have concerns angrychair Jun 2016 #346

This sounds good to me wysi Jun 2016 #350

Can't wait! And thanks for everything. nolabear Jun 2016 #351

Okay. H2O Man Jun 2016 #356

No, this looks bad, H2O Man. Hissyspit Jun 2016 #470

Thank you. Kicking. littlemissmartypants Jun 2016 #358

Skinner, This is still a bit nebulous. floriduck Jun 2016 #359

Of course not. Skinner Jun 2016 #368

The Hill does lean right but I find their reporting on factual issues to be rather reliable. PoliticAverse Jun 2016 #403

Hopefully civility will begin to return. BumRushDaShow Jun 2016 #363

K&R ... horseshoecrab Jun 2016 #365

Are all the current hides going to be erased and everyone starts with a clean slate or is everyone.. ChisolmTrailDem Jun 2016 #370

That worked out so well the last time.... truebrit71 Jun 2016 #373

Everyone should start clean Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #441

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #460

argh, I will have to behave myself more Skittles Jun 2016 #378

Looking forward to a spirited but civil DU... VOX Jun 2016 #379

I say thank you also! Greywing Jun 2016 #386

So many of these are great but I hope you're not opening up a massive can of worms with this one Number23 Jun 2016 #385

K&R! SaschaHM Jun 2016 #388

THANK YOU! tarheelsunc Jun 2016 #391

I " Bend the Knee" Skinner... FarPoint Jun 2016 #395

Thanks Skinner JesterCS Jun 2016 #398

About juries Peachhead22 Jun 2016 #401

yep, cult-like reverence for dem public figures stupidicus Jun 2016 #409

Some of these rules are amazingly vaguely worded. Hissyspit Jun 2016 #473

indeed they are stupidicus Jun 2016 #488

This sounds great. Thanks. k&r DesertRat Jun 2016 #410

Don't believe in the word spoiler anymore though... PatrynXX Jun 2016 #417

The work that you three must have put into these changes is appreciated, but ... countryjake Jun 2016 #418

Thanks hopefully people will comply or just leave. Historic NY Jun 2016 #422

I do appreciate that you keep on trying. SusanCalvin Jun 2016 #428

Thanks for the information. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #433

I've stayed out if the primary discussion intentionally. Socal31 Jun 2016 #434

Easy Peasy Except RW Talking Points billhicks76 Jun 2016 #446

I'm worried about this language in the rules, too. snot Jun 2016 #448

I support the Citizens United decision and also free trade. Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #450

there will be a contested convention - hopemountain Jun 2016 #454

looks like I won't be posting on the election soon captainarizona Jun 2016 #456

So, in a nutshell, common sense? liberaltrucker Jun 2016 #457

What is the rule on avatars? pangaia Jun 2016 #459

I am excited Administration. I can do this and the opportunity it is giving to DU. Very exciting. seabeyond Jun 2016 #461

I won't be able to serve on a jury until 2 days after the general election... Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #462

AGREE 100% flying-skeleton Jun 2016 #463

Not fair on the jury system Lunabell Jun 2016 #464

$1 gives you DU with no ads for a year Renew Deal Jun 2016 #477

You should add how many times someone has been on a jury back to profiles. cui bono Jun 2016 #466

Will the rules apply to "Groups"? cui bono Jun 2016 #467

Very Happy..... bobGandolf Jun 2016 #468

Very comprehensive. I look forward to implementation; jurying should be interesting. Hekate Jun 2016 #469

IF this part is followed DonCoquixote Jun 2016 #475

This is great, but has one flaw. athena Jun 2016 #479

Great point. Dark n Stormy Knight Jun 2016 #496

Blue Dogs zipplewrath Jun 2016 #485

Links to or reposting of outside works zipplewrath Jun 2016 #486

I hope this works. Not to be a Debbie Downer but I doubt it will. Puglover Jun 2016 #487

DU3 is morphing back into DU2, just without moderators. Behind the Aegis Jun 2016 #490

Probably because every bit of transparency has been abused and provided much more drama stevenleser Jun 2016 #491

Rather than denying transparency... Behind the Aegis Jun 2016 #493

Also, the amount of times someone served on a jury was eliminated. cui bono Jun 2016 #495

Exactly. Puglover Jun 2016 #498

Transition to Echo Chamber deaniac21 Jun 2016 #501

Pfffft. If by "Echo Chamber" you mean people who hate Democrats are going to be checked, bring on MADem Jun 2016 #503

I'm pretty sure they meant the right wing of the Democratic Party fawning over a center-corporatist cui bono Jun 2016 #506

Hey, deaniac21 Jun 2016 #516

Skinner, it is your site. saidsimplesimon Jun 2016 #502

Whoa, so this place is becoming a full blown and super loyalist to the Democratic party type site. One Black Sheep Jun 2016 #508

Skinner, would you consider leaving the notifications of jury results? AgadorSparticus Jun 2016 #509

Suggestion about members with many hides: set those at 5 or more back to 3 or 4 muriel_volestrangler Jun 2016 #510

This message was self-deleted by its author Miles Archer Jun 2016 #511

The inability to see entire thread randr Jun 2016 #522

After having over a week DemonGoddess Jun 2016 #523

I like the changes. LeftInTX Sep 2016 #524

Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2017 #525