Announcements

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)

427. By your standards Bernie would be a conservative as well. Lumping Hillary in

Reply to Doctor_J (Reply #384)

Wed Jun 8, 2016, 07:57 PM

Jun 2016

With Cruz et al is ridiculous

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

525 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

DU General Election Season Begins Soon: What You Need To Know [View all] Skinner Jun 2016 OP

kick & recommended. William769 Jun 2016 #1

Nothing will make me forgive Dr. Strange. Nothing. Orrex Jun 2016 #2

A big K&R---Time to kick in some more money to DU. trumad Jun 2016 #3

This sounds good. DCBob Jun 2016 #4

Enormous K & R. Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #5

KNR Lucinda Jun 2016 #6

Halle-fucking-lujah! DU will once again be the ... 11 Bravo Jun 2016 #7

At the expense of the UNDERGROUND. Hissyspit Jun 2016 #471

Sounds good. I hope it works well! mean it. boston bean Jun 2016 #8

Yes. nt msanthrope Jun 2016 #17

+1000 gollygee Jun 2016 #33

It's always baffled me that it was never there. NYC Liberal Jun 2016 #46

Yes it does... Phentex Jun 2016 #74

That's a very uncharitable suggestion of all the people who choose not to or cannot pay. AtheistCrusader Jun 2016 #211

Just trolls... Phentex Jun 2016 #216

People used to buy others a star in the past. Usually if the person was a valued member who kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #276

Any donation buys you a star BainsBane Jun 2016 #294

It doesn't even do that. AtheistCrusader Jun 2016 #352

I don't have extra $$ to donate to DU like I used to. I don't appreciate the assumption auntAgonist Jun 2016 #521

Totally agree BooScout Jun 2016 #194

YUP.... +++++ hlthe2b Jun 2016 #202

Plus a billion on the sexism, it's about time. bettyellen Jun 2016 #252

Yes, + another billion. Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #306

Ready! ucrdem Jun 2016 #9

K&R for great plans PJMcK Jun 2016 #10

Thank you. And I hope there will be a big ass link to the rules page at the start of each forum! Native Jun 2016 #11

I'm in! Loki Jun 2016 #12

Thanks, benevolent overlord! UrbScotty Jun 2016 #13

Major K&R EileenFB Jun 2016 #14

How about reading the rules mountain grammy Jun 2016 #36

Your winner/whiner thing will have to go. panader0 Jun 2016 #77

I think they have til June 16th. MH1 Jun 2016 #213

I hate those bugs (n/t) PJMcK Jun 2016 #236

Taken care of EileenFB Jun 2016 #293

I'm a Hillary supporter and I don't like that sig pic either. Lisa0825 Jun 2016 #166

I have to agree. It only serves to drive the people we need away from our party and candidate. kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #278

Excellent. A lot of effort and thought went into this. Thank you. nt msanthrope Jun 2016 #15

Thank you Skinner. Some much-needed rule changes here. NYC Liberal Jun 2016 #16

That's the plan. Skinner Jun 2016 #61

Thanks. NYC Liberal Jun 2016 #70

The flaw is that some people here are 'organized' and they will keep alerting on a post -none Jun 2016 #303

The reactionaries won. sulphurdunn Jun 2016 #354

a conservative female won the primary Doctor_J Jun 2016 #377

Shes liberal squirecam Jun 2016 #380

. Doctor_J Jun 2016 #384

By your standards Bernie would be a conservative as well. Lumping Hillary in redstateblues Jun 2016 #427

Will you support Clinton when she agitates for war with Iran? Ikonoklast Jun 2016 #476

Maybe some of them do. chwaliszewski Jun 2016 #478

New Democrats love foreign wars and intervention in conflicts having nothing to do with us. Ikonoklast Jun 2016 #489

If they are shot down unanimously, as one would expect to be the case if it is totally frivolous, Nitram Jun 2016 #88

I think it sounds pretty good. nt BootinUp Jun 2016 #18

Thank goodness! PatSeg Jun 2016 #19

Yes, some true colors were surely shown and will not be forgotten. nt ChisolmTrailDem Jun 2016 #267

I'd like to think I'll remember OriginalGeek Jun 2016 #347

Wow, this all looks pretty great. auntpurl Jun 2016 #20

Agreed. spooky3 Jun 2016 #47

Because we have come to view it as a catalyst for forum drama. Skinner Jun 2016 #69

Fair enough. auntpurl Jun 2016 #75

There is such a rule--included in the "Content" section above: tblue37 Jun 2016 #114

But you have included a rule forbidding jurors to post those results, so tblue37 Jun 2016 #109

We learned from the years when we had rules... Skinner Jun 2016 #118

Skinner, if the posting of Jury Results was alert-able violation - we'd quickly learn not to do it. vkkv Jun 2016 #165

I have to agree. auntpurl Jun 2016 #263

i agree with you all. phylny Jun 2016 #376

I agree. JudyM Jun 2016 #357

Agreed. snot Jun 2016 #447

I would be less inclined to pay for a star in order to serve on juries if... ChisolmTrailDem Jun 2016 #272

I understand your point about not publishing the results mentalsolstice Jun 2016 #173

I just took myself off the willing to serve. If I can't find out what happened.... trueblue2007 Jun 2016 #519

I just served on a jury for the 1st time under new rules, totally unsatisfying! mentalsolstice Jun 2016 #520

Your new approach to jury duty will make me willing to serve again. dixiegrrrrl Jun 2016 #177

Guilty... Agschmid Jun 2016 #305

I also like to know whether I am an outlier or not. tblue37 Jun 2016 #102

My first reaction was not to like this too but I think in the new incarnation of the jury system it stevenleser Jun 2016 #197

Well, we will see how it works. I have never liked not knowing the outcome of tblue37 Jun 2016 #203

Yes, in psychology we call it "observer drift" or "observer bias" auntpurl Jun 2016 #260

That caught my eye as well. Chemisse Jun 2016 #394

So "BernieBros" and "BoB" meets a welcome demise on the 16th. Thank you. Miles Archer Jun 2016 #21

Just to clarify, I mean the nicknames, not the supporters. Miles Archer Jun 2016 #67

Yes, disrespectful nicknames are not permitted. (nt) Skinner Jun 2016 #72

thanks squirecam Jun 2016 #383

Who decides what's disrespectful? baldguy Jun 2016 #444

Sounds like a plan skinner. Good job. applegrove Jun 2016 #22

That must have been a great deal of work for Elad! Good luck with this, I really hope it works MADem Jun 2016 #23

God dammit, I guess I finally have to get a star... Godhumor Jun 2016 #24

The winning change... onehandle Jun 2016 #25

I can live with this ahimsa Jun 2016 #174

High five Peachhead22 Jun 2016 #412

Verbatim lupinella Jun 2016 #484

Been here over a year DVRacer Jun 2016 #429

This excellent news calls for some dancing... stevenleser Jun 2016 #26

says something about me that my first thot irisblue Jun 2016 #375

Sounds good, a lot of us can do better individually, and we can all do better collectively nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #27

That's a lot of work that went into this sharp_stick Jun 2016 #28

K&R! stonecutter357 Jun 2016 #29

It looks like you are taking all the fun out of serving on a jury. Tobin S. Jun 2016 #30

Agreed--to the serious part! spooky3 Jun 2016 #40

~ Kicked & Recommended ~ In_The_Wind Jun 2016 #31

I do a lot of SQA IRL if you need help. AND I get the cast off my hand today so I can be effective!! PeaceNikki Jun 2016 #32

I'll bet you are looking forward to that!! brer cat Jun 2016 #273

"The privilege to serve on a Jury ...active Star membership." That's beautiful, man. n/t jtuck004 Jun 2016 #34

How many of us go "star-less", waiting to purchase hearts? JustABozoOnThisBus Jun 2016 #355

"No kooky...content"? That's my go to. Oh well, ok. NightWatcher Jun 2016 #35

I think the Lounge may still accept non-political kooky content. Don't lose hope! LonePirate Jun 2016 #120

On personal attacks... Gormy Cuss Jun 2016 #37

Don't know. Skinner Jun 2016 #78

That percent of active posters may change after the 16th, Gormy. dixiegrrrrl Jun 2016 #84

A lot are leaving and going to be leaving too after the treatment they've gotten here by... ChisolmTrailDem Jun 2016 #279

Long time ago I learned I did not have to bite every fishhook around. dixiegrrrrl Jun 2016 #364

A-yup. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2016 #500

Overall I say the changes should be good. I'm looking forward to your tweaks too. LiberalFighter Jun 2016 #38

Great, but I have one suggestion: spooky3 Jun 2016 #39

Agree; I posted this above. auntpurl Jun 2016 #44

Yes--it appears several of us agree. spooky3 Jun 2016 #45

Me three Nitram Jun 2016 #94

I also agree. montana_hazeleyes Jun 2016 #195

I also agree. femmocrat Jun 2016 #148

Don't you think one would be able to determine if they were off base or not notadmblnd Jun 2016 #285

I like knowing the explanations, and whether it was 6-1 vs 4-3 for example. spooky3 Jun 2016 #392

From what I read there'll no longer be an opportunity for comments when adjudicating offensive posts notadmblnd Jun 2016 #408

If you'll check my earlier posts, I (and others) suggested that spooky3 Jun 2016 #414

well I feel there will be no benefit from letting people post their judgemental remarks notadmblnd Jun 2016 #415

The notification gives you a link back to what was judicated mentalsolstice Jun 2016 #393

That would require that you go search for that thread and that post. Chemisse Jun 2016 #397

You are provided a link to the post when you are asked to perform jury service notadmblnd Jun 2016 #406

This message was self-deleted by its author arikara Jun 2016 #100

I agree with that too Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #106

I learn from reading others' opinions as well. nt Ilsa Jun 2016 #168

This message was self-deleted by its author totodeinhere Jun 2016 #231

Not only do I agree, but even if it was left alone, the poster needs to know Reter Jun 2016 #442

Skinner has previously stated that this would freak out the poster. athena Jun 2016 #455

Thank you, Admins! The new DU rules look very promising! BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #41

Sounds like the DU I remember - the one I became addicted to liberal N proud Jun 2016 #42

"Don't start threads in the wrong forum or group" etherealtruth Jun 2016 #43

^^Good question^^^ Bobbie Jo Jun 2016 #59

We will still have hosts. Skinner Jun 2016 #80

Thanks, Skinner! greatauntoftriplets Jun 2016 #48

It looks good. Thanks for the hard work to make this place better. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #49

Thank you for letting us know where we stand Marrah_G Jun 2016 #50

TL:DR progressoid Jun 2016 #51

I found it sometimes helpful to evaulate posts in-thread ... Auggie Jun 2016 #52

Jurors will still get the necessary context. Skinner Jun 2016 #81

I like all the changes except one. the one about the star requirement. Exilednight Jun 2016 #53

I think it's to show commitment to the website. auntpurl Jun 2016 #56

I agree. Exilednight Jun 2016 #64

Good news is that now you can get a star for a dollar. dixiegrrrrl Jun 2016 #223

We cannot buy stars for someone else anymore. dixiegrrrrl Jun 2016 #188

Oh, I didn't know that. auntpurl Jun 2016 #192

Not directly, but you could paypal them some $ for the purpose. stevenleser Jun 2016 #200

Prior to the required "subscription" model, DUers dis buy stars for other people. Miles Archer Jun 2016 #517

Serving on juries is a privilege. Skinner Jun 2016 #92

So providing content ... Delver Rootnose Jun 2016 #175

Also the 1000+ post requirement,though The Green Manalishi Jun 2016 #229

Well I'd be off... Delver Rootnose Jun 2016 #243

The world will continue to turn without me. The Green Manalishi Jun 2016 #249

Won't matter much to me.... Delver Rootnose Jun 2016 #259

Got to make up for the loss of all the "Berniebros" revenue somehow right? truebrit71 Jun 2016 #265

You do realize.... Delver Rootnose Jun 2016 #277

You do realize truebrit71 Jun 2016 #280

Trolls aren't dropping $20 to become members Renew Deal Jun 2016 #297

You can get a star for $1. truebrit71 Jun 2016 #316

And give up your real name, real email address, etc. Renew Deal Jun 2016 #325

Sold out! SouthernDemLinda Jun 2016 #321

"Providing content?" That seems like a high handed way of saying MADem Jun 2016 #504

Seems to me Curmudgeoness Jun 2016 #438

Yeah, I mean, I'm not a star member, but I'm also not that concerned about serving on juries... kjones Jun 2016 #98

Good idea - those non-star members who have to face the advertising on this site are still playing vkkv Jun 2016 #186

Is there any minimum price to get a star? Renew Deal Jun 2016 #295

Outstanding! Bobbie Jo Jun 2016 #54

I might need a 'sarcasm shield' of some kind for my posts. fleabiscuit Jun 2016 #55

Well i hope the new rules help and i promise to try to do better. hrmjustin Jun 2016 #57

I have one quick question. herding cats Jun 2016 #58

If you find the post after you are finished with jury service... Skinner Jun 2016 #93

It's not a big deal anyway herding cats Jun 2016 #172

what you just said seems contrary to what you said upthread: dixiegrrrrl Jun 2016 #204

To clarify Skinner Jun 2016 #217

I take it that ends grave-dancing and terms like DINO Maeve Jun 2016 #60

Hey hey, look at my shiny new star! auntpurl Jun 2016 #62

I find the 1000 post rule notemason Jun 2016 #63

Agreed. "Star members who have been members for a year and have at least 100 posts" Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #154

Thank you. notemason Jun 2016 #178

Yaaaay! FINALLY!!!!! This is long overdue. nt AgadorSparticus Jun 2016 #65

Kicked and recommended! Thank you Skinner and admin team... Firebrand Gary Jun 2016 #66

I know how you feel, Gary. calimary Jun 2016 #513

So... we're to shut up and bow our heads.. modestybl Jun 2016 #68

You managed to get pretty much the opposite of what Skinner was saying. nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #115

I understand we are not to criticize Dem candidates from here on out... modestybl Jun 2016 #130

Here's a good example. "I don't agree with Bernie's characterization of his history of support or stevenleser Jun 2016 #176

Thank you. This is a very good example of criticism vs bashing. uppityperson Jun 2016 #282

Another example please? SouthernDemLinda Jun 2016 #334

Sure, I dont agree with Bernie supporters characterization of the email investigation. stevenleser Jun 2016 #348

Calling out bad policies, losing strategies, corruption and outright lying has always been permitted Renew Deal Jun 2016 #300

Nope, this is different: Hissyspit Jun 2016 #472

No, he's asking you/us to STOP being the Dem version of Free Republic. n/t Lil Missy Jun 2016 #512

This change: Alerters and Jurors will no longer receive notifications after Jury service is complete vkkv Jun 2016 #71

I agree. It's useful & informative to see the results. n/t 99th_Monkey Jun 2016 #179

Thirded (n/t) Jon Ace Jun 2016 #399

That combined with the 1,000 post rule marle35 Jun 2016 #480

Thank you Skinner, it looks good passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #73

That's an excellent idea. Amimnoch Jun 2016 #99

+1. nt tblue37 Jun 2016 #144

I agree. femmocrat Jun 2016 #167

Posts should be able to reference RW pages when demolishing them or posting excerpts as examples. Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2016 #183

That does not change my request passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #222

A list might be good. & Skinner posted the rule which shows that RW links OK in the way I suggest. Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2016 #245

After I posted, Skinner replied to someone else that there won't be a list passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #269

What is Right wing or not, seems to depend on who posted the link and -none Jun 2016 #323

We've had a rash of articles posted from THE HILL passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #349

Totally agreed Peachhead22 Jun 2016 #419

Thirded. charlyvi Jun 2016 #210

No. That makes it too easy to troll ecstatic Jun 2016 #266

I like this suggestion. musicblind Jun 2016 #497

Thank you! mcar Jun 2016 #76

Understood. lpbk2713 Jun 2016 #79

Does "No divisive group attacks" mean no discussion of Third Way vs. traditional Democrats? senz Jun 2016 #82

It serves the Third Way to deny the existence of any distinction. JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #242

You will stop using this photo after 16th hertopos Jun 2016 #413

To whom? senz Jun 2016 #423

Calling anyone you disagree with third way is an insult . Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #435

You have to pay to be on a jury? Kentonio Jun 2016 #83

Generally, don't you find that free things and opportunities are less appreciated? Plus, vkkv Jun 2016 #97

Yes. Just like the nominee. Pay to play. truebrit71 Jun 2016 #286

I like "Don't bash Democratic public figures". Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #85

+10^10^100 stevenleser Jun 2016 #122

"May not be loved" hueymahl Jun 2016 #149

I agree with hueymahl and this concerns me too. aquamarina Jun 2016 #238

Agree 100% workinclasszero Jun 2016 #190

So, what's legitimate criticism versus "bashing" Democratic public figures? All those names deserve leveymg Jun 2016 #209

Take Rahm Emanuel as an example. I would vote to hide this post on the grounds of "bashing": Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #261

Reasonable. leveymg Jun 2016 #319

That's easy. Dr Hobbitstein Jun 2016 #287

+1. "Hillary should not have voted for the IWR" Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #298

Exactly. Nt Dr Hobbitstein Jun 2016 #304

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #335

Agree, those are easy cases. But, it's the hard cases that are the problem, and leveymg Jun 2016 #327

"Hard cases" will probably end up with 4-3 jury decisions, one way or the other. Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #371

The 'first amendment' is only a protection from the government. (As are all the BoR rights.) X_Digger Jun 2016 #458

+1 brer cat Jun 2016 #281

Yea, no more holding our own's feet to the fire or calling out authoritarian and right-wing... ChisolmTrailDem Jun 2016 #296

There have to be some exceptions Reter Jun 2016 #443

These changes look good, thanks Skinner, EarlG and Elad... Spazito Jun 2016 #86

The civility and political rules are clear and forceful as phrased. tblue37 Jun 2016 #87

Does "the portion of the thread relevant to the alerted post" mean all posts in the 'ancestral line' muriel_volestrangler Jun 2016 #89

The entire "ancestral line." Skinner Jun 2016 #103

Yikes, you probably won't have too many posting on here from June until Nov. glowing Jun 2016 #90

I'm concerned about this also hueymahl Jun 2016 #163

See my #176 above. Skinner please feel free to correct me if I am off. nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #180

"write in" SouthernDemLinda Jun 2016 #308

+1 ! FailureToCommunicate Jun 2016 #411

Tiny Dreams vs. Tiny Hands valerief Jun 2016 #431

l look at it differently Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #439

I live in FL and we still have primaries in August for state and local races. glowing Jun 2016 #453

K&R! DemonGoddess Jun 2016 #91

Thanks. Can't wait. K&R L. Coyote Jun 2016 #95

Not sure I understand the point of the "gradation" of jury choices. morningfog Jun 2016 #96

The purpose of the gradation of jury choices... Skinner Jun 2016 #113

You could always retain the comments as.... Delver Rootnose Jun 2016 #199

Looks good. I'm sure there will be refinements, too, MineralMan Jun 2016 #101

Sounds like a successful plan. Thanks for your efforts. oasis Jun 2016 #104

A couple of questions regarding hidden posts: George II Jun 2016 #105

Answers. Skinner Jun 2016 #136

See ya after the 16th pengu Jun 2016 #107

Not having folks like you claim everyone they disagree with is a paid Brock shill is worth doubling stevenleser Jun 2016 #129

Ok? pengu Jun 2016 #132

You, apparently. You cared enough to respond. nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #134

smh pengu Jun 2016 #143

How can we miss you charlyvi Jun 2016 #381

Unfair I was taking a drink when I scrolled down lol DVRacer Jun 2016 #452

See ya, upaloopa Jun 2016 #151

The thought police... SouthernDemLinda Jun 2016 #331

This is great news. I came to DU in 2001 to support Democrats. OKNancy Jun 2016 #108

Yes!!! Man, it will feel so good for DU to be DU again. Lyric Jun 2016 #110

Very cool. Liking the sound of the new jury system. Politicub Jun 2016 #111

Bravo! ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #112

Caution Wibly Jun 2016 #116

This is not the Democratic party this is an owner operated web site. Don't bash Democrats here upaloopa Jun 2016 #138

It's going to be just like the talk! SouthernDemLinda Jun 2016 #374

I notice that about 98% of the recs to this announcement are members of the HRC group. panader0 Jun 2016 #117

Don't you have your jack shit or something other web site to keep bashing Hillary? Go there upaloopa Jun 2016 #121

I don't think insulting posts like yours will be allowed under the new rules. panader0 Jun 2016 #126

What's insulting. You have your Hillary bashing web site call Jack something upaloopa Jun 2016 #133

"jack shit" is insulting. panader0 Jun 2016 #159

I don't quite understand how the jack website survives now Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #437

Your use of the phrase "HRC worship" is noteworthy too. NurseJackie Jun 2016 #150

When no critcism is allowed--what do you call it? panader0 Jun 2016 #171

a lot of people will have to learn the relevant differences between criticism and name-calling LanternWaste Jun 2016 #208

I believe the names like "HRC worship" came about All in it together Jun 2016 #314

"jack shit" website is a snotty cheap shot sgainst progressive Dems AntiBank Jun 2016 #292

As near as I can tell, it's a website that exists for the sole purpose of taking pot-shots ... NurseJackie Jun 2016 #366

Whether you realize it, you've just described the troll-haven Rob H. Jun 2016 #402

That's not a site that I visit. If you see someone touting it or encouraging defection ... NurseJackie Jun 2016 #405

As near as I can tell, Curmudgeoness Jun 2016 #440

Sure. NurseJackie Jun 2016 #445

Probably because we have been the targets of most of the nastiness here. stevenleser Jun 2016 #157

the targets of most of the nastiness here. AlbertCat Jun 2016 #215

The objections to the civility rules from one corner is evidence enough. nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #225

ridiculous narcissism AntiBank Jun 2016 #302

The objections to the new civility rules from one corner is evidence enough. nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #307

I am not objecting in the slightest, simply saying it's a 2 way street AntiBank Jun 2016 #320

You are not the only Bernie supporter here. You mentioned narcissism? nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #329

I never claimed I was, nor that I spoke for them. AntiBank Jun 2016 #333

Bear in mind Newsmax, where you appear isn't going to be on the approved sources last... truebrit71 Jun 2016 #361

Sure it will as it will when I appear on Fox. You are twisting Skinners rules stevenleser Jun 2016 #367

You first... truebrit71 Jun 2016 #372

Well, I voted for Bernie yesterday The Green Manalishi Jun 2016 #248

Of course melman Jun 2016 #426

Good to see. How about not letting people use Polls to create an "enemies list". mackdaddy Jun 2016 #119

long overdue. the rules system worked very well, the jury system has proven quite flawed unblock Jun 2016 #123

Jurors will be able to see the context. Skinner Jun 2016 #131

ah, brilliant. unblock Jun 2016 #142

A quibble about context for alerted post unc70 Jun 2016 #389

K & R and thank you for your hard work! nt femmocrat Jun 2016 #124

So paying members will sit in judgement of us all. No thanks and buh bye. CBGLuthier Jun 2016 #125

Bye and remember the thing about the door on the way out. upaloopa Jun 2016 #128

These changes seem like a move in the right direction. Thanks! LonePirate Jun 2016 #127

You don't know how correct you actually are. -none Jun 2016 #340

Thank you - good job stevil Jun 2016 #135

Lots of positive changes here. Decoy of Fenris Jun 2016 #137

QUESTION: Will "Jury Blacklists" be eliminated too? (nt) NurseJackie Jun 2016 #139

Not sure. Skinner Jun 2016 #146

I think the blacklists prevent a lot of stalking... bettyellen Jun 2016 #256

^^^This^^^ -none Jun 2016 #341

With the new rules, let them, they will lose their juror privileges. I may empty my blacklist stevenleser Jun 2016 #360

Now this sounds like a plan! BooScout Jun 2016 #140

With the move to GE standing, will Admin permit User Name changes now or after November? . . . Journeyman Jun 2016 #141

We do not have plans to do so at this time. (nt) Skinner Jun 2016 #153

Q: where is the list of prohibited right-wing publications, authors, or pundits? john978 Jun 2016 #145

There is no list. Skinner Jun 2016 #152

But what if it is accurate.... Delver Rootnose Jun 2016 #185

The rule says Skinner Jun 2016 #187

And you risk being alerted... Delver Rootnose Jun 2016 #207

And the new jury rules say the admins can overrule a jury's decision. stevenleser Jun 2016 #246

And I'm betting it won't.... Delver Rootnose Jun 2016 #258

I agree with your analysis - seems DU wants to be the definition of establishment. nt john978 Jun 2016 #301

I wonder if Fox news employees are allowed to post here Doctor_J Jun 2016 #432

{{{snort}}} Oh no you didn't!!! eom Purveyor Jun 2016 #436

Oh good now Joe Lieberman..... Delver Rootnose Jun 2016 #147

Joe Lieberman did become an "Independent" and was elected Senator running against a Democrat. n/t PoliticAverse Jun 2016 #191

It seems from your posts in this thread that you have issues with the new rules, and that is fine, still_one Jun 2016 #353

The operative ...... Delver Rootnose Jun 2016 #400

A democratic party supporting DU once more! workinclasszero Jun 2016 #155

Skinner, what about locks aquired during the primary process, will they reset back to 0? Logical Jun 2016 #156

Probably. Skinner Jun 2016 #161

I hope that is it, the trouble makers will get 5 soon enough. Thanks for all you do! Nt Logical Jun 2016 #201

I am sorry if someone asked and I missed it but are you implimenting the 5 hide rule like hrmjustin Jun 2016 #158

We will have a stopgap that will flag people who get five hides or more. (nt) Skinner Jun 2016 #164

Thanks. hrmjustin Jun 2016 #170

So, when do we get the GD-General election forum opened??? I'm ready to bash some trump! Amimnoch Jun 2016 #160

Oh my god that is so disturbing. auntpurl Jun 2016 #214

It is extremely disturbing isn't it... Amimnoch Jun 2016 #218

K&R nt ProudProgressiveNow Jun 2016 #162

I am glad to see awoke_in_2003 Jun 2016 #169

Problem with graphic content and context rule unc70 Jun 2016 #396

There should be a new LBN rule Omaha Steve Jun 2016 #181

No kooky, how about wacky? j/k n/t hibbing Jun 2016 #182

I agree with everything, except for "Alerters and Jurors will no longer receive notifications after lunamagica Jun 2016 #184

I agree Blue Idaho Jun 2016 #284

I'll miss serving on juries, but the changes look good -- I have no beef with them. Thanks! . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2016 #189

I don't understand the rationale for the 4 options (jury) and how Ilsa Jun 2016 #193

Sounds good! yardwork Jun 2016 #196

"Civility begets quality discussions" wildeyed Jun 2016 #198

Will we still be able to call AngryAmish an asshole? AngryAmish Jun 2016 #205

Post Olympic spoilers and see what happens... Phentex Jun 2016 #227

I like the proposed changes... nice job! InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2016 #206

Kick treestar Jun 2016 #212

So nobody can call me a Republican Troll or an uneducated voter again :-) redstatebluegirl Jun 2016 #219

Skinner: honest question katsy Jun 2016 #220

We believe that these rules do not disallow any good-faith discussion of issues. Skinner Jun 2016 #228

That's where my confusion lay. katsy Jun 2016 #264

Thank you, Elad and all other admins for your thoughtful work. ancianita Jun 2016 #221

Agree, agree. A breath of fresh air SCantiGOP Jun 2016 #224

Thank you, Skinner. TygrBright Jun 2016 #226

The votes are tallied as a binary Yes/No Skinner Jun 2016 #232

ah, OK, got that. TygrBright Jun 2016 #239

Back to where Democrats support Democrats. What a relief!! demosincebirth Jun 2016 #230

Amazing concept, no? stevenleser Jun 2016 #233

Yup. demosincebirth Jun 2016 #244

and where liberals are persona non grata Doctor_J Jun 2016 #382

Ahh, I can hardly wait for June 16th...like a kid waiting for demosincebirth Jun 2016 #430

........... desmiller Jun 2016 #234

What are "Transparency pages"? thanks n/t left-of-center2012 Jun 2016 #235

It shows your hidden posts. Skinner Jun 2016 #237

Thanks for the comedy! nolabels Jun 2016 #240

This is an excellent start, thank you very much steve2470 Jun 2016 #241

So apparently there will still be no penalty... NaturalHigh Jun 2016 #247

Not correct. Skinner Jun 2016 #250

Oh. Thanks for clarifying that. NaturalHigh Jun 2016 #251

Skinner- A possible suggestion for future consideration on the "jury results" issue. TygrBright Jun 2016 #253

Yet you will change nothing on DI? Where homophobia/etc stands (against TOS), anyone can serve, etc? The Straight Story Jun 2016 #254

Question: Kelvin Mace Jun 2016 #255

this is why squirecam Jun 2016 #387

I am sorry, was I speaking to you? Kelvin Mace Jun 2016 #407

Criticism does not mean insults. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #492

"registered for at least one year - more than 1,000 posts - active Star membership" -- 2 out of 3 ? eppur_se_muova Jun 2016 #257

Sounds good annabanana Jun 2016 #262

Everything looks good but I have a question. IrishEyes Jun 2016 #268

That is correct, but... Skinner Jun 2016 #271

Kinda defeats... ymetca Jun 2016 #270

Thank heavens! tallahasseedem Jun 2016 #274

Well, Most of This I Dig ProfessorGAC Jun 2016 #275

This sounds good! brer cat Jun 2016 #283

I hope every criticism of Hillary isn't labelled sexist and flagged as such adigal Jun 2016 #288

I think... c-ville rook Jun 2016 #289

Comments and concerns Behind the Aegis Jun 2016 #290

BtA, I have to say I agree with much of your post. Especially the part about transparency and seaglass Jun 2016 #344

This concern ^^^ Ms. Toad Jun 2016 #404

In an ideal world, alerts regarding bigotry would be sent to jurors from the group in question. stevenleser Jun 2016 #416

I think you're personally taking on a lot of grief Renew Deal Jun 2016 #291

The appeals process is going to be a huge pain in the ass for the admins. Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #390

Out of curiosity...could you please comment on... xocet Jun 2016 #299

So DU is going to start supporting Democrats IronLionZion Jun 2016 #309

It's PUPPIES!!! warrprayer Jun 2016 #310

K&R gademocrat7 Jun 2016 #311

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #312

Love the new Jury System RockaFowler Jun 2016 #313

bookmarked lovemydog Jun 2016 #315

Presumptive nominee is not the nomiee Geronimoe Jun 2016 #317

No one is forcing you to support anyone. leftofcool Jun 2016 #330

Here is the link Geronimoe Jun 2016 #449

Thank You Skinner! Blue Idaho Jun 2016 #318

You'd better get a good lawyer!!! pamela Jun 2016 #322

lol Renew Deal Jun 2016 #326

Uh oh, that's 101 now... FSogol Jun 2016 #362

good, lets get on with supporting democrats MFM008 Jun 2016 #324

I appreciate all the work you guys one_voice Jun 2016 #328

Is there any way we could have a rule tavernier Jun 2016 #332

K&R !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! n/t RKP5637 Jun 2016 #336

Suggestion re: Jury time frames Algernon Moncrieff Jun 2016 #337

Enhhh... There've been times when I accepted a jury invite when browsing on my phone ... NurseJackie Jun 2016 #369

I'll admit there have been a few when I had to go look at the thread to get context. Algernon Moncrieff Jun 2016 #451

Curious as to why, rather than instuting these rules earlier, you opted for a free for all cui bono Jun 2016 #338

I know some of you Sanders supporters believe this, I just can't see how you can delude yourself stevenleser Jun 2016 #343

If that were true, then all the more reason to enact the rules earlier so as not to show bias. cui bono Jun 2016 #420

Keep pretending you didn't control the juries and the overall tenor on DU. stevenleser Jun 2016 #421

LOL! Yes, THAT'S why JPR was created. WE WANT TOTAL CONTROL!!! cui bono Jun 2016 #424

You can call yourselves whatever you want, it's what you did. nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #425

I forgot to mention what you did. Posted one of the two most vile OPs in DU history. cui bono Jun 2016 #465

I'm Jewish, so no, I posted nothing anti-semitic. Nice try though. nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #482

So? Another DUer who is a PoC posted a racist's rant and an anti-semitic post. cui bono Jun 2016 #494

You made the allegation, you provide the link. nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #499

1. We all know that's against the rules. 2. I'm no longer a star member so search is useless. cui bono Jun 2016 #505

I'm so glad you raised all of this nonsense. I've been waiting for the opportunity. stevenleser Jun 2016 #514

I think you just got your rear handed to you. nt msanthrope Jun 2016 #515

Results... Major Nikon Jun 2016 #483

Thanks. cui bono Jun 2016 #507

"Progressives" who wanted to be able to JTFrog Jun 2016 #481

"The worst offenders were Sanders supporters?" I just can't see how you can delude yourself. Miles Archer Jun 2016 #518

This post is spot on. Capt. Obvious Jun 2016 #474

Kudos to you! Good start. One small point . . . . Stinky The Clown Jun 2016 #339

Question on "Don't bash Democratic public figures"... backscatter712 Jun 2016 #342

Thank you, Skinner. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #345

I appreciate the effort but do have concerns angrychair Jun 2016 #346

This sounds good to me wysi Jun 2016 #350

Can't wait! And thanks for everything. nolabear Jun 2016 #351

Okay. H2O Man Jun 2016 #356

No, this looks bad, H2O Man. Hissyspit Jun 2016 #470

Thank you. Kicking. littlemissmartypants Jun 2016 #358

Skinner, This is still a bit nebulous. floriduck Jun 2016 #359

Of course not. Skinner Jun 2016 #368

The Hill does lean right but I find their reporting on factual issues to be rather reliable. PoliticAverse Jun 2016 #403

Hopefully civility will begin to return. BumRushDaShow Jun 2016 #363

K&R ... horseshoecrab Jun 2016 #365

Are all the current hides going to be erased and everyone starts with a clean slate or is everyone.. ChisolmTrailDem Jun 2016 #370

That worked out so well the last time.... truebrit71 Jun 2016 #373

Everyone should start clean Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #441

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #460

argh, I will have to behave myself more Skittles Jun 2016 #378

Looking forward to a spirited but civil DU... VOX Jun 2016 #379

I say thank you also! Greywing Jun 2016 #386

So many of these are great but I hope you're not opening up a massive can of worms with this one Number23 Jun 2016 #385

K&R! SaschaHM Jun 2016 #388

THANK YOU! tarheelsunc Jun 2016 #391

I " Bend the Knee" Skinner... FarPoint Jun 2016 #395

Thanks Skinner JesterCS Jun 2016 #398

About juries Peachhead22 Jun 2016 #401

yep, cult-like reverence for dem public figures stupidicus Jun 2016 #409

Some of these rules are amazingly vaguely worded. Hissyspit Jun 2016 #473

indeed they are stupidicus Jun 2016 #488

This sounds great. Thanks. k&r DesertRat Jun 2016 #410

Don't believe in the word spoiler anymore though... PatrynXX Jun 2016 #417

The work that you three must have put into these changes is appreciated, but ... countryjake Jun 2016 #418

Thanks hopefully people will comply or just leave. Historic NY Jun 2016 #422

I do appreciate that you keep on trying. SusanCalvin Jun 2016 #428

Thanks for the information. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #433

I've stayed out if the primary discussion intentionally. Socal31 Jun 2016 #434

Easy Peasy Except RW Talking Points billhicks76 Jun 2016 #446

I'm worried about this language in the rules, too. snot Jun 2016 #448

I support the Citizens United decision and also free trade. Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #450

there will be a contested convention - hopemountain Jun 2016 #454

looks like I won't be posting on the election soon captainarizona Jun 2016 #456

So, in a nutshell, common sense? liberaltrucker Jun 2016 #457

What is the rule on avatars? pangaia Jun 2016 #459

I am excited Administration. I can do this and the opportunity it is giving to DU. Very exciting. seabeyond Jun 2016 #461

I won't be able to serve on a jury until 2 days after the general election... Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #462

AGREE 100% flying-skeleton Jun 2016 #463

Not fair on the jury system Lunabell Jun 2016 #464

$1 gives you DU with no ads for a year Renew Deal Jun 2016 #477

You should add how many times someone has been on a jury back to profiles. cui bono Jun 2016 #466

Will the rules apply to "Groups"? cui bono Jun 2016 #467

Very Happy..... bobGandolf Jun 2016 #468

Very comprehensive. I look forward to implementation; jurying should be interesting. Hekate Jun 2016 #469

IF this part is followed DonCoquixote Jun 2016 #475

This is great, but has one flaw. athena Jun 2016 #479

Great point. Dark n Stormy Knight Jun 2016 #496

Blue Dogs zipplewrath Jun 2016 #485

Links to or reposting of outside works zipplewrath Jun 2016 #486

I hope this works. Not to be a Debbie Downer but I doubt it will. Puglover Jun 2016 #487

DU3 is morphing back into DU2, just without moderators. Behind the Aegis Jun 2016 #490

Probably because every bit of transparency has been abused and provided much more drama stevenleser Jun 2016 #491

Rather than denying transparency... Behind the Aegis Jun 2016 #493

Also, the amount of times someone served on a jury was eliminated. cui bono Jun 2016 #495

Exactly. Puglover Jun 2016 #498

Transition to Echo Chamber deaniac21 Jun 2016 #501

Pfffft. If by "Echo Chamber" you mean people who hate Democrats are going to be checked, bring on MADem Jun 2016 #503

I'm pretty sure they meant the right wing of the Democratic Party fawning over a center-corporatist cui bono Jun 2016 #506

Hey, deaniac21 Jun 2016 #516

Skinner, it is your site. saidsimplesimon Jun 2016 #502

Whoa, so this place is becoming a full blown and super loyalist to the Democratic party type site. One Black Sheep Jun 2016 #508

Skinner, would you consider leaving the notifications of jury results? AgadorSparticus Jun 2016 #509

Suggestion about members with many hides: set those at 5 or more back to 3 or 4 muriel_volestrangler Jun 2016 #510

This message was self-deleted by its author Miles Archer Jun 2016 #511

The inability to see entire thread randr Jun 2016 #522

After having over a week DemonGoddess Jun 2016 #523

I like the changes. LeftInTX Sep 2016 #524

Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2017 #525