Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

ificandream

(10,937 posts)
Tue Dec 3, 2024, 01:27 PM Dec 3

Mattel Sued Over 'Wicked' Dolls That Included Link to Porn Website on Packaging [View all]

Last edited Tue Dec 3, 2024, 03:05 PM - Edit history (5)

Source: Variety


Photo courtesy of Mattel

Mattel is being sued for mistakenly printing the URL for a pornographic site on the packaging for special-edition "Wicked" dolls.

According to court documents, a South Carolina resident is launching a class action lawsuit after purchasing the toy for her young daughter, who visited the X-rated website that had "nothing to do with the 'Wicked' doll." The toy company mistakenly listed a similarly-titled website for the adult-entertainment site Wicked Pictures, rather than the official page for the Universal Pictures film, starring Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande. The plaintiff alleges that Mattel didn't offer a refund and believes she and her child suffered "emotional distress" from the misprint.

"These scenes were hardcore, full on nude pornographic images depicting actual intercourse," the lawsuit reads. "Plaintiff's minor daughter immediately showed her mother the photographs and both were horrified by what they saw. If plaintiff had been aware of such an inappropriate defect in the product, she would not have purchased it."

Mattel, the manufacturer of Barbie, pulled the toy from shelves at retailers including Target, Amazon and Kohl's. It also issued a statement that it was "aware of a misprint on the packaging of the Mattel 'Wicked' collection dolls, primarily sold in the United States, which intended to direct consumers to the official WickedMovie.com landing page." The company advised consumers who already have the dolls to "discard the product packaging or obscure the link."

Read more: https://variety.com/2024/film/news/mattel-sued-wicked-dolls-porn-website-1236233693/



So wait ... you allowed your daughter to navigate the internet without your supervision and you're now suing Mattel saying it was their fault?

Some earlier stories:

1. 'Wicked' Doll Packaging Misprint Drives 12-Year Surge in Traffic to Porn Site] (Nov. 11): https://variety.com/2024/digital/news/wicked-porn-site-traffic-surge-doll-package-misprint-1236206484/
2. Mattel's 'Wicked' Movie Dolls Mistakenly List Porn Site on Packaging] (Nov. 10) https://variety.com/2024/film/news/mattel-wicked-dolls-porn-site-packaging-1236206056/

Note quote from the second story:
The film's official website is WickedMovie.com, but the address listed on the plastic packaging for the special edition dolls, created in partnership with Universal Pictures, is written as Wicked.com. The latter website directs to a page that requires users to be 18 years or older to enter.


In other words, the user had to be 18 years or older to enter when the Variety story was published on 11/10/24. A minor couldn't have seen any porn unless they lied about their age.

Something smells here. This is nothing more than a cash grab.

Court filing: https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/25430678/mattel-class-action.pdf

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Mattel Sued Over 'Wicked'...