Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield decides not to proceed with new anesthesia policy [View all]pnwmom
(109,657 posts)41. That's awful -- but no one among my friends or family has reported an experience like that.
I wonder if the issue is that your wife had some Medicare Advantage or other closed system insurance plan? If you have regular Medicare, for example, that wouldn't happen.
The vast majority of hospitals take Medicare, and anesthesiologists wouldn't be able to practice there unless they did, too.
And I still don't see what was incorrect about the anesthesiologists statement. Anthem said that "misinformation" was being spread but didn't explain what the misinformation was.
The policy, which would have covered Anthem's plans in Connecticut, New York and Missouri, was disclosed in recent weeks, with the company's New York unit posting a notice on Dec. 1. The policy would have excluded people under 22 years old and maternity care.
According to the original policy statement, Anthem had said it would pay only for anesthesia treatments for the length of time that a procedure or surgery is estimated to require based on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service's physician work time values. The insurer noted that claims for anesthesia "above the established number of minutes will be denied."
According to the original policy statement, Anthem had said it would pay only for anesthesia treatments for the length of time that a procedure or surgery is estimated to require based on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service's physician work time values. The insurer noted that claims for anesthesia "above the established number of minutes will be denied."
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/anthem-blue-cross-blue-shield-anesthesia-coverage-policy/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
52 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield decides not to proceed with new anesthesia policy [View all]
pnwmom
Dec 5
OP
"signficant" backlash? I'd bet so overwhelminng their systems were going down & they were probably
hlthe2b
Dec 5
#5
Hell, if that is indeed what it takes now, the blame rests entirely with the gun worshipers for making it possible.
Karasu
Dec 5
#37
Without Recourse To Maintain Life, Liberty, And The Pursuit Of Happiness Mankind Turns To Extrajudicial Means
MayReasonRule
Dec 5
#10
Ya bummer that came out day one of theirs was murder. Totally amplified what they wanted done
LizBeth
Dec 5
#15
I think the murder is why the Anesthesiologist Advocacy group issued their statement yesterday
AZSkiffyGeek
Dec 5
#27
That's awful -- but no one among my friends or family has reported an experience like that.
pnwmom
Dec 5
#41
For the future, have you heard about the No Surprises Act? No one is supposed to find out
pnwmom
Dec 6
#47
Isn't that nice of them ............I could have seen it now on the consent form going
turbinetree
Dec 5
#31
I imagine the execution murder of the UnitedHealthCare CEO figured heavily in their decision.
patphil
Dec 5
#32
I guess senior management got the message after watching the country at large react to yesterday's shooting in NYC.
W T F
Dec 5
#34
Gee. I wonder what could've POSSIBLY provoked this sudden change of heart. Because it sure as fuck wasn't done out of
Karasu
Dec 5
#35
Nobody seems to care that they were trying to implement Medicare billing standards?
mathematic
Dec 5
#45
One insurance company has already pulled their "About Us" page off their web site.
LiberalArkie
Dec 6
#50