Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
2. Not saying it would happen, but ...
Fri Dec 6, 2024, 05:21 AM
Dec 6

... I could easily imagine a maintenance crew chief telling his crew that a mechanical problem is not serious enough to warrant the ($200 x 300 passengers) $60,000 a twenty-minute delay to double check a fuel line or replace a landing gear lug nut would cost the airline. Or worse an airline exec making that same decision with no clue what mechanical problems might actually be important.

Might this lead to airlines overlooking problems to avoid payouts for delays? Might that cause potentially unsafe conditions to be ignored?

I imagine the idea is to incentivize airlines to plan and schedule enough time to do maintenance before the passengers are involved. But that also costs money.

If this goes through it will be interesting to see the results.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Biden Proposal Would Make...»Reply #2