Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(73,894 posts)
4. Here's how the judge ended the interaction:
Fri Dec 6, 2024, 11:30 AM
Dec 6




During the incident in question, Mesa County Judge Matthew Barrett did not sanction Peters. Instead, he warned her after a bit of back-and-forth between the court, Peters, and a prosecutor.

Peters, for her part, denied recording.

Here’s how the judge ended the interaction:
Well, the bottom line is — as I mentioned, there’s a sign on the door that says no recording, video, audio — it’s all common sense for most folks to know that. This is a recorded proceeding in any event. So, this is the one warning that the individual in the courtroom will get. If I find that someone has violated this order in the future, then I’ll take appropriate action, and it will be appropriate — no doubt in my mind about that.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Tina Peters appeals conte...»Reply #4