Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I don't believe it, it was the russians Shellback Squid Sunday #1
Absolutely. And WaPo is a shitty news source. Dave Bowman Sunday #3
First, They are reporting on .... reACTIONary Sunday #6
Wapo is a shitty news source, period. Dave Bowman Sunday #11
Okey Dokey .... reACTIONary Sunday #13
they have the satellite tracking of one of the ships that cut the electrical line going to Finland lapfog_1 Yesterday #45
Backtracking is certainly a suspicious maneuver.... reACTIONary 19 hrs ago #46
And you know this how? paleotn Sunday #23
No chance it was an accident. That ship dragged its anchor for miles and miles. Calista241 Sunday #2
That, along with several other facts and assessments... reACTIONary Sunday #7
Cover story PJMcK Sunday #4
Why would "the governments" want .... reACTIONary Sunday #9
Consider this PJMcK Sunday #14
Thanks for your reply! In my own opinion.... reACTIONary Sunday #20
Yeah, right dalton99a Sunday #5
That sounds like a bigger pile of crap than a tRump diaper load. CentralMass Sunday #8
See #29 for article links which would refute this bs SheltieLover Sunday #32
Why would cables be laid where "maritime accidents" could occur? BadgerKid Sunday #10
If they cross the entirety of a body of water used for maritime trade, Igel Sunday #16
Because there isn't any other place... reACTIONary Sunday #18
??? paleotn Sunday #24
I have a hard time believing that RazorbackExpat Sunday #12
Finland and others are not buying this............ riversedge Sunday #15
Thanks! It seems from this excerpt.... reACTIONary Sunday #19
Precisely! And would not explain NATO prepping SheltieLover Sunday #29
Yep, sure is Marthe48 Sunday #17
Bull. No names making these assertions. No attribution. It's all "sources." n/t dobleremolque Sunday #21
Yow! You mean that WaPo.... reACTIONary Sunday #22
No disrespect for your opinion Gymbo Sunday #25
Bad seamanship is more common than you think. paleotn Sunday #28
Yet, you automatically believe unattributed sources who agree with your views on things. paleotn Sunday #30
Reminds me of the "Call before you dig" adverts in the yellow pages back in the day. paleotn Sunday #26
I'm no sea-captain, The Unmitigated Gall Sunday #27
Did we raise anchor? Yeah, yeah, it's raised......................oh shit! paleotn Sunday #31
Lets not overlook who owns WAPO & where his loyalties lie SheltieLover Sunday #33
Cutting Undersea Cables is No Accident But is Inexpensive Hybrid Warfare C0RI0LANUS Sunday #34
See #29 above for links to posts on articles seeming to refute WAPOs bs SheltieLover Sunday #35
Hi SheltieLover. Concur. C0RI0LANUS Sunday #36
Absolutely! SheltieLover Sunday #37
Thanks! SheltieLover Sunday #43
Thanks for those links... reACTIONary Sunday #41
It is unclear to me why you are so defensive of the WAPO SheltieLover Sunday #42
I am a defender of all good, solid enterprise reporting.... reACTIONary Sunday #44
Last year off the coast of California, an oil line sprung Buddyzbuddy Sunday #38
Thanks! It would be interesting to compare to these incidents. reACTIONary Sunday #40
Bullshit orangecrush Sunday #39
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Accidents, not Russian sa...»Reply #3