Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I don't believe it, it was the russians Shellback Squid Jan 2025 #1
Absolutely. And WaPo is a shitty news source. Dave Bowman Jan 2025 #3
First, They are reporting on .... reACTIONary Jan 2025 #6
Wapo is a shitty news source, period. Dave Bowman Jan 2025 #11
Okey Dokey .... reACTIONary Jan 2025 #13
they have the satellite tracking of one of the ships that cut the electrical line going to Finland lapfog_1 Jan 2025 #45
Backtracking is certainly a suspicious maneuver.... reACTIONary Jan 2025 #46
And you know this how? paleotn Jan 2025 #23
No chance it was an accident. That ship dragged its anchor for miles and miles. Calista241 Jan 2025 #2
That, along with several other facts and assessments... reACTIONary Jan 2025 #7
Cover story PJMcK Jan 2025 #4
Why would "the governments" want .... reACTIONary Jan 2025 #9
Consider this PJMcK Jan 2025 #14
Thanks for your reply! In my own opinion.... reACTIONary Jan 2025 #20
Yeah, right dalton99a Jan 2025 #5
That sounds like a bigger pile of crap than a tRump diaper load. CentralMass Jan 2025 #8
See #29 for article links which would refute this bs SheltieLover Jan 2025 #32
Why would cables be laid where "maritime accidents" could occur? BadgerKid Jan 2025 #10
If they cross the entirety of a body of water used for maritime trade, Igel Jan 2025 #16
Because there isn't any other place... reACTIONary Jan 2025 #18
??? paleotn Jan 2025 #24
I have a hard time believing that RazorbackExpat Jan 2025 #12
Finland and others are not buying this............ riversedge Jan 2025 #15
Thanks! It seems from this excerpt.... reACTIONary Jan 2025 #19
Precisely! And would not explain NATO prepping SheltieLover Jan 2025 #29
Yep, sure is Marthe48 Jan 2025 #17
Bull. No names making these assertions. No attribution. It's all "sources." n/t dobleremolque Jan 2025 #21
Yow! You mean that WaPo.... reACTIONary Jan 2025 #22
No disrespect for your opinion Gymbo Jan 2025 #25
Bad seamanship is more common than you think. paleotn Jan 2025 #28
Yet, you automatically believe unattributed sources who agree with your views on things. paleotn Jan 2025 #30
Reminds me of the "Call before you dig" adverts in the yellow pages back in the day. paleotn Jan 2025 #26
I'm no sea-captain, The Unmitigated Gall Jan 2025 #27
Did we raise anchor? Yeah, yeah, it's raised......................oh shit! paleotn Jan 2025 #31
Lets not overlook who owns WAPO & where his loyalties lie SheltieLover Jan 2025 #33
Cutting Undersea Cables is No Accident But is Inexpensive Hybrid Warfare C0RI0LANUS Jan 2025 #34
See #29 above for links to posts on articles seeming to refute WAPOs bs SheltieLover Jan 2025 #35
Hi SheltieLover. Concur. C0RI0LANUS Jan 2025 #36
Absolutely! SheltieLover Jan 2025 #37
Thanks! SheltieLover Jan 2025 #43
Thanks for those links... reACTIONary Jan 2025 #41
It is unclear to me why you are so defensive of the WAPO SheltieLover Jan 2025 #42
I am a defender of all good, solid enterprise reporting.... reACTIONary Jan 2025 #44
Last year off the coast of California, an oil line sprung Buddyzbuddy Jan 2025 #38
Thanks! It would be interesting to compare to these incidents. reACTIONary Jan 2025 #40
Bullshit orangecrush Jan 2025 #39
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Accidents, not Russian sa...»Reply #32