Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

reACTIONary

(6,227 posts)
46. Backtracking is certainly a suspicious maneuver....
Mon Jan 20, 2025, 10:09 AM
19 hrs ago

... but I did a quick survey and could find no mention of it in any other reporting. Where did you read about that? Can you provide a source?

It is true that the "shadow fleet" of ships that transport sanctioned Russian oil - such as this one, the Eagle S - regularly turn off their transponders to avoid being tracked. Sometime they do so in order to meet up with another tanker mid-ocean and transfer oil from one ship to another.

There is satellite tracking, independent of the transponders, but it is spotty, because the satellites fly over quickly - there isn't 100% coverage making it hard to track a moving object. I know about some of this because I work for an organization that is developing satellite ship tracking software that can be used to spot suspicious behavior even with incomplete satellite coverage.

With the exception of the backtracking, all of this is typical of sanction evasion and is carried out regularly by the "shadow fleet". But even the backtracking might be part of an sanctions evasion strategy. In any case, I can't find a source for the backtracking - let me know where you learned of that.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I don't believe it, it was the russians Shellback Squid Sunday #1
Absolutely. And WaPo is a shitty news source. Dave Bowman Sunday #3
First, They are reporting on .... reACTIONary Sunday #6
Wapo is a shitty news source, period. Dave Bowman Sunday #11
Okey Dokey .... reACTIONary Sunday #13
they have the satellite tracking of one of the ships that cut the electrical line going to Finland lapfog_1 Yesterday #45
Backtracking is certainly a suspicious maneuver.... reACTIONary 19 hrs ago #46
And you know this how? paleotn Sunday #23
No chance it was an accident. That ship dragged its anchor for miles and miles. Calista241 Sunday #2
That, along with several other facts and assessments... reACTIONary Sunday #7
Cover story PJMcK Sunday #4
Why would "the governments" want .... reACTIONary Sunday #9
Consider this PJMcK Sunday #14
Thanks for your reply! In my own opinion.... reACTIONary Sunday #20
Yeah, right dalton99a Sunday #5
That sounds like a bigger pile of crap than a tRump diaper load. CentralMass Sunday #8
See #29 for article links which would refute this bs SheltieLover Sunday #32
Why would cables be laid where "maritime accidents" could occur? BadgerKid Sunday #10
If they cross the entirety of a body of water used for maritime trade, Igel Sunday #16
Because there isn't any other place... reACTIONary Sunday #18
??? paleotn Sunday #24
I have a hard time believing that RazorbackExpat Sunday #12
Finland and others are not buying this............ riversedge Sunday #15
Thanks! It seems from this excerpt.... reACTIONary Sunday #19
Precisely! And would not explain NATO prepping SheltieLover Sunday #29
Yep, sure is Marthe48 Sunday #17
Bull. No names making these assertions. No attribution. It's all "sources." n/t dobleremolque Sunday #21
Yow! You mean that WaPo.... reACTIONary Sunday #22
No disrespect for your opinion Gymbo Sunday #25
Bad seamanship is more common than you think. paleotn Sunday #28
Yet, you automatically believe unattributed sources who agree with your views on things. paleotn Sunday #30
Reminds me of the "Call before you dig" adverts in the yellow pages back in the day. paleotn Sunday #26
I'm no sea-captain, The Unmitigated Gall Sunday #27
Did we raise anchor? Yeah, yeah, it's raised......................oh shit! paleotn Sunday #31
Lets not overlook who owns WAPO & where his loyalties lie SheltieLover Sunday #33
Cutting Undersea Cables is No Accident But is Inexpensive Hybrid Warfare C0RI0LANUS Sunday #34
See #29 above for links to posts on articles seeming to refute WAPOs bs SheltieLover Sunday #35
Hi SheltieLover. Concur. C0RI0LANUS Sunday #36
Absolutely! SheltieLover Sunday #37
Thanks! SheltieLover Sunday #43
Thanks for those links... reACTIONary Sunday #41
It is unclear to me why you are so defensive of the WAPO SheltieLover Sunday #42
I am a defender of all good, solid enterprise reporting.... reACTIONary Sunday #44
Last year off the coast of California, an oil line sprung Buddyzbuddy Sunday #38
Thanks! It would be interesting to compare to these incidents. reACTIONary Sunday #40
Bullshit orangecrush Sunday #39
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Accidents, not Russian sa...»Reply #46