Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
4. NOT a Department, name notwithstanding.
Mon Jan 20, 2025, 11:19 AM
Jan 2025

I have been calling them an advisory group as that seems to be the only thing that fits. It had not occurred to me that there would be various transparency laws that would apply to them. They have to fit within some official framework, or they should have only the access to federal offices and agencies that any US citizens would have, which is relatively limited.

Or they could claim to be consultants the President has hired to conduct an efficiency review of the Executive branch, but that likely has regulatory and legal implications as well.

I hope the case goes before a reasonable judge.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

give 'em hell markie Jan 2025 #1
And only stop when they are actually in Hell where they belong. GreenWave Jan 2025 #2
YES! Fight back! Fla Dem Jan 2025 #3
NOT a Department, name notwithstanding. SomewhereInTheMiddle Jan 2025 #4
Excellent drmeow Jan 2025 #5
Good! highplainsdem Jan 2025 #6
Party of Law & Order.. bull crap. nt Exp Jan 2025 #7
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Elon Musk's DOGE to be su...»Reply #4