Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(168,002 posts)
Tue Feb 24, 2026, 04:00 PM Yesterday

Supreme Court rules the Postal Service can't be sued, even when mail is intentionally not delivered [View all]

Source: AP

Updated 12:56 PM EST, February 24, 2026


WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that Americans can’t sue the U.S. Postal Service, even when employees deliberately refuse to deliver mail.

By a 5-4 vote, the justices ruled against a Texas landlord, Lebene Konan, who alleges her mail was intentionally withheld for two years. Konan, who is Black, claims racial prejudice played a role in postal employees’ actions.

Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for a majority of five conservative justices, said the federal law that generally shields the Postal Service from lawsuits over missing, lost and undelivered mail includes “the intentional nondelivery of mail.”

In dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that while the protection against lawsuits is broad, it does not extend to situations when the decision not to deliver mail “was driven by malicious reasons.” Justice Neil Gorsuch joined his three liberal colleagues in dissent.

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-postal-service-missing-mail-7ce97a5b7d56373cdeaa6ecc9a9132f5



Link to RULING (PDF) - https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-351_7648.pdf
27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
. dalton99a Yesterday #1
Bizarre and awful wolfie001 Yesterday #6
Absolutely! Failure to deliver services has gone off the deep end. slightlv Yesterday #14
Wrong sexual preference? No marriage license for you! Seinan Sensei 19 hrs ago #19
Newman says... Be The Light 22 hrs ago #18
Evil, unconstitutional decision. What about our mailed ballots? SunSeeker Yesterday #2
Legal Cover For Intentional Non-delivery Of Ballots 2na fisherman Yesterday #12
Instead of civil relief, can she/we pursue criminal charges? SomewhereInTheMiddle 19 hrs ago #20
Theft Of The Mail 2na fisherman 7 hrs ago #25
First step towards mail-in vote fraud synni Yesterday #3
Why does everyone have qualified immunity except me? catrose Yesterday #4
I thought it was always like that. A government operation can not be sued unless the organization agrees to it. LiberalArkie Yesterday #5
there was a spate of fires in collection boxes a few yrs ago mopinko Yesterday #9
Be ready folks. coming decisions from THIS supreme court will bluestarone Yesterday #7
Non Delivery of mail maliaSmith Yesterday #8
In my state we have ballot drop boxes in addition to the US mail Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Yesterday #13
Same, and it's impossible to tell how you voted Qutzupalotl 4 hrs ago #27
... progressoid Yesterday #10
Epstein rules. ananda Yesterday #11
Oh, how I hope we completely overwhelm them! slightlv Yesterday #15
The law always makes exceptions for malicious reasons. Baitball Blogger 23 hrs ago #16
Thomas is Americas Uncle Tom. BradBo 22 hrs ago #17
Mail sabotage due to political party will be a given Blue Dotty 18 hrs ago #21
Just another reason to vote in person, if you can. COL Mustard 14 hrs ago #22
IMHO, Thomas is an irrelevant potted plant BumRushDaShow 13 hrs ago #23
We are witnessing a supreme court that whole goal is bluestarone 7 hrs ago #24
Justice Clarence Thomas rules racism and discrimination against black people is ok!!! Multichromatic 7 hrs ago #26
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court rules the P...