Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Don't tease us... Funtatlaguy May 10 #1
I Agree, Endless Teasing & Not Much Action WiVoter May 10 #18
He can't unilaterally decide to release the evidence InstantGratification May 10 #31
I believe the time is coming when an avalanche of previously withheld and/or hidden liberalla May 10 #33
I hope you're right. calimary Monday #45
"...material that could prove damaging to the president." J_William_Ryan May 10 #2
Why has this information NOT been released to the public already? Bluetus May 10 #6
Much of it was sealed by Judge Cannon Nt Fiendish Thingy May 10 #35
She can't seal the world. Bluetus May 10 #40
She sealed his report Fiendish Thingy May 10 #41
It might persuade some voters to vote differently in November. BadgerMom Monday #44
Bring it on, Jack Smith! Let's hear all of it ... unredacted FakeNoose May 10 #3
Just think. relogic May 10 #7
He needs a safety switch. multigraincracker May 10 #16
All that information popsdenver May 10 #21
Don't hold your breath, not goona happen. Btw, source is raw story. msfiddlestix May 10 #36
Not when it's published in the New York Times first ... Raw Story is reprinting the NYT story FakeNoose May 10 #37
Did Raw Story actually republish the New York Times story, or did they write a version with a certain spin that stretche msfiddlestix Monday #47
Do it! sheshe2 May 10 #4
If he has further evidence, he should release it. JohnnyRingo May 10 #5
Mueller orangecrush May 10 #8
Why wait????? The way to stop a predator is to strike first and hard. Ford_Prefect May 10 #9
Don't think this is the man trump wants to mess with. republianmushroom May 10 #10
Ewwwww Just Jerome May 10 #20
Why not? The old one sin't working too good: 3Hotdogs May 10 #26
Why "private" is part of the title? What am I missing? question everything May 10 #11
He is a private individual now, no longer employed by the public/government. nt SunSeeker May 10 #13
The remarks were made in private? liberalla May 10 #25
A private event. Invited guests only I would surmise. AZ8theist May 10 #27
Mr. Smith should hire bodyguards Bayard May 10 #12
It's not just popsdenver May 10 #22
Is that a bone spur report? generalbetrayus May 10 #14
I've often wondered why Trump has not had to deal with leaks Nixie May 10 #15
He is insulated popsdenver May 10 #24
SOMEONE has to have some guts and get the truth out. johnnyplankton May 10 #17
I believe that Jack Smith has the integrity to do it FakeNoose May 10 #42
So why didn't he release it before the presidential election?? mucifer May 10 #19
He would have been breaking the law FakeNoose May 10 #43
If he's prosecuted for illegally investigating trump radical noodle May 10 #23
Jack Smith has something BAD on Donald. Joinfortmill May 10 #28
So he'll drop this stuff only to help himself? johnp3907 May 10 #29
Just do it. Piecemeal it if you want but just get it out thete Deuxcents May 10 #30
At first I thought Jack Smith had enlisted in the army with the rank of Private Redleg May 10 #32
More Raw Story bullshit.... reACTIONary May 10 #34
MaddowBlog-Silent no more, Jack Smith calls out Trump's 'corrupted' Justice Department LetMyPeopleVote May 10 #38
Jack Smith Calls the Justice Dept. 'Corrupted' by Trump and His Allies (NYT gift article) LetMyPeopleVote May 10 #39
Jack Smith.... MarcoZandrini Monday #46
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Private Jack Smith remark...»Reply #9