Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

BumRushDaShow

(172,121 posts)

5. That's because the process hadn't gotten that far yet to award contracts

Reply to RainCaster (Reply #3)

Sat May 16, 2026, 06:43 AM

10 hrs ago

I scanned the complaint (linked to in the OP comments) and apparently this lawsuit was filed against BLM based on their initial plans, which were alleged to have significant misclassifications and mischaracterizations of the forests, and a lack of an environmental impact statement in violation of at least 2 laws.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

valleyrogue

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Federal judge blocks old-growth logging project on Oregon coast [View all] BumRushDaShow 20 hrs ago OP

I hope this win is not appealed Deuxcents 19 hrs ago #1

My grandmother taught me the old lesson about wants and needs. Cutting these is definitely a want. Assasins IMO n/t Cheezoholic 19 hrs ago #2

The article never told us who the logging firms are RainCaster 18 hrs ago #3

That's because the process hadn't gotten that far yet to award contracts BumRushDaShow 10 hrs ago #5

Who is pressuring the BLM to open up these old growth forests? RainCaster 7 hrs ago #6

Good republianmushroom 18 hrs ago #4