Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(174,579 posts)
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 01:35 PM Jun 30

Supreme Court will consider whether laws called assault weapons bans violate the Second Amendment [View all]

Source: AP

Updated 1:22 PM EDT, June 30, 2026


WASHINGTON (AP) — A Supreme Court that has expanded gun rights will consider whether bans on semiautomatic rifles, often called assault weapons, violate the Second Amendment.

The justices said Tuesday they will hear appeals challenging bans on the AR-15 and similar semiautomatic firearms in Connecticut and the Chicago area.

Similar laws are in place in about a dozen states, covering major cities like New York, Los Angeles and Washington, D.C. Congress allowed a national assault weapons ban to expire in 2004, but Democrats have supported renewing it in response to a series of mass shootings. States have also continued to pass their own laws, including recent measures in Virginia and Rhode Island.

It is the latest high-profile dispute over guns to reach the court since its conservative majority handed down a landmark ruling in 2022 that expanded Second Amendment rights and spawned challenges to firearm laws around the country. Arguments are expected to be heard in the fall.

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-assault-weapons-ban-ar15-a362863265ba8630e71068fe5b75bb8e

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Since the 6 fascist court majority are so afraid of their security, a problem they themselves created, I would be ImNotGod Jun 30 #1
Or their fears could cause them to vote against the bans PatSeg Jun 30 #2
If they do, well, then, it's machine guns for everyone ashredux Jun 30 #3
Who said "small artillery"? And one boy's small is anothers ginormous. erronis Jun 30 #7
If they do, well, then, it's machine guns for everyone ashredux Jun 30 #4
how come they ignore the well-regulated part of the 2nd? pansypoo53219 Jun 30 #5
You know, one of these years .. not in my lifetime ... the Court will finally take "well-regulated' into account. ificandream Jun 30 #12
If you had participated in DU's long-ago Gungeon debates, you'd know maxsolomon Jun 30 #14
language does change. pansypoo53219 Jun 30 #15
Tell that to the "Originalists" maxsolomon Jul 1 #16
This was addressed in the Heller decision PCB66 Jul 1 #17
It would seem to me Mr.Bee Jun 30 #6
Ballistic missile? Bullets made with spent uranium? (Or not spent yet.) erronis Jun 30 #8
It was written for muskets Bayard Jun 30 #9
With so many Americans living in fear of someone lost knocking on their door, Torchlight Jun 30 #10
"Supreme Court will consider" J_William_Ryan Jun 30 #11
The only possible way and i mean only possible way THIS supreme court would ban assault weapons is bluestarone Jun 30 #13
If they're so original purr-rat beauty Jul 1 #18
That's already been decided in Caetano v Massachusetts in 2016 which said the 2A is not limited to the tech at the time DetroitLegalBeagle Jul 1 #19
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court will consid...