Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 95 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court will consid...»Reply #6
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

In reply to the discussion: Supreme Court will consider whether laws called assault weapons bans violate the Second Amendment [View all]

Mr.Bee

(2,007 posts)
6. It would seem to me
Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 02:42 PM
Jun 30

there would have to be a CLEAR definition of what 'arms' are.
A Handgun?
A Machine gun?
A Rocket-Propelled Grenade?
A tank?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

erronisBayard
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Supreme Court will consider whether laws called assault weapons bans violate the Second Amendment [View all] BumRushDaShow Jun 30 OP
Since the 6 fascist court majority are so afraid of their security, a problem they themselves created, I would be ImNotGod Jun 30 #1
Or their fears could cause them to vote against the bans PatSeg Jun 30 #2
If they do, well, then, it's machine guns for everyone ashredux Jun 30 #3
Who said "small artillery"? And one boy's small is anothers ginormous. erronis Jun 30 #7
If they do, well, then, it's machine guns for everyone ashredux Jun 30 #4
how come they ignore the well-regulated part of the 2nd? pansypoo53219 Jun 30 #5
You know, one of these years .. not in my lifetime ... the Court will finally take "well-regulated' into account. ificandream Jun 30 #12
If you had participated in DU's long-ago Gungeon debates, you'd know maxsolomon Jun 30 #14
language does change. pansypoo53219 Jun 30 #15
Tell that to the "Originalists" maxsolomon Wednesday #16
This was addressed in the Heller decision PCB66 Wednesday #17
It would seem to me Mr.Bee Jun 30 #6
Ballistic missile? Bullets made with spent uranium? (Or not spent yet.) erronis Jun 30 #8
It was written for muskets Bayard Jun 30 #9
With so many Americans living in fear of someone lost knocking on their door, Torchlight Jun 30 #10
"Supreme Court will consider" J_William_Ryan Jun 30 #11
The only possible way and i mean only possible way THIS supreme court would ban assault weapons is bluestarone Jun 30 #13
If they're so original purr-rat beauty Wednesday #18
That's already been decided in Caetano v Massachusetts in 2016 which said the 2A is not limited to the tech at the time DetroitLegalBeagle Wednesday #19
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court will consid...»Reply #6
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2026 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.