Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

(30,146 posts)

3. Wut?

Wed Mar 4, 2026, 11:05 AM

Wednesday

13 justices is packing the court but adding 91 justices isn't? That makes no sense whatsoever.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Case For A 100-Justice Supreme Court [View all] mahatmakanejeeves Wednesday OP

I want 52. yourout Wednesday #2

Wut? intheflow Wednesday #3

The plan is to have a pool of 100 justices from which 9 or 13 or whatever are mahatmakanejeeves Wednesday #4

I totally agree with this and have been advocating it for years. Midnight Writer Wednesday #5