Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

underpants

(198,132 posts)

2. My wife and I were discussing the 278k part and it looks like we were right.

Reply to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)

Fri Jul 17, 2026, 09:56 PM

11 hrs ago

Does that account for people who’ve naturalized?
Does that account for localities that allow non citizens to vote in local elections?

The statement in question was “There are 278,000 people on voting rolls who were not citizens”

ON VOTING ROLLS? What rolls? CAN they be on the rolls?
WERE? At one point were they not citizens? What is their status now?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump says these documents prove his false claims of election fraud. Here's what they really say [View all] mahatmakanejeeves 12 hrs ago OP

color me shocked mike_c 11 hrs ago #1

My wife and I were discussing the 278k part and it looks like we were right. underpants 11 hrs ago #2

"On the rolls" is not the same as "having voted." PSPS 10 hrs ago #3

Yes. VDOT messed up once when my wife nenewed her license underpants 1 hr ago #5

so, this made him lose the 2020 election Skittles 8 hrs ago #4