Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
5. Yeah, that's a left-reformist position........
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:03 AM
Apr 2016

NOT a socialist position. At least not a revolutionary socialist position. It's akin to social democracy. If your opposition to capitalism is based on the fact that you will NEVER get fairness OF ANY SORT short of a social revolution, then "...changes short of their ideological leanings" would be a non-starter. Here's the deal, if you're FORCED to "compromise" for less because of the makeup of the social forces involved, well, that's objective reality, but if you go into the struggle thinking you're going to compromise, that's not a principled stand.

As to the social issues, that's a place where Marxists and populists, even left populists like Sanders, differ. Marxists have ALWAYS recognized special oppression and super-exploitation as key factors in the class struggle.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Socialist Progressives»The Intersectional Workin...»Reply #5