Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

California

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(117,637 posts)
Thu Jun 16, 2022, 06:29 PM Jun 2022

Should California gun owners be forced to buy liability insurance? A new bill says yes. [View all]

California could become the first state in the country to require gun owners to be insured against the negligent or accidental use of their firearms under legislation introduced Thursday.

“Guns kill more people than cars,” Sen. Nancy Skinner (D-Berkeley) said in a statement. “Yet gun owners are not required to carry liability insurance like car owners must. Why should taxpayers, survivors, families, employers, and communities bear the $280 billion annual cost of gun violence? It’s time for gun owners to shoulder their fair share.”

Skinner introduced legislation Thursday morning as an amendment to SB-505, an unrelated bill which will be gutted. The announcement follows a string of gun violence measures that the Legislature has treated with special urgency last month’s school shooting in Uvalde, Texas.

If the bill passes, it will require gun owners to carry coverage for losses from death, injury, property damage and other incidents. Owners would have to keep written evidence of their policy where the gun is stored, and to carry it when transporting the firearm. They would be considered civilly liable for negligent or accidental use.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/should-california-gun-owners-be-forced-to-buy-liability-insurance-a-new-bill-says-yes/ar-AAYyKIK

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I have mixed feelings about it. Mr.Bill Jun 2022 #1
That's self-defense insurance protection Shermann Jun 2022 #3
It's simple math...TAX AMMUNITION! Thunderbeast Jun 2022 #2
Why only $35? MichMan Jun 2022 #4
$280 billion dollars in damages divided by 8 billion bullets equals $35 per round Thunderbeast Jun 2022 #5
It's a punitive tax DetroitLegalBeagle Jun 2022 #6
Does $712 per gun per year sound better? Thunderbeast Jun 2022 #7
No, its not better. DetroitLegalBeagle Jun 2022 #8
It will get tossed out The Mouth Jun 2022 #9
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»Should California gun own...»Reply #0