Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

California

Shermann

(8,738 posts)

3. That's self-defense insurance protection

Reply to Mr.Bill (Reply #1)

Thu Jun 16, 2022, 06:46 PM

Jun 2022

The vast majority of gun deaths are completely intentional. These types of policies won't pick up the tab for criminal gun violence by the policy holder. I'm not sure any policies do.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Should California gun owners be forced to buy liability insurance? A new bill says yes. [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2022 OP

I have mixed feelings about it. Mr.Bill Jun 2022 #1

That's self-defense insurance protection Shermann Jun 2022 #3

It's simple math...TAX AMMUNITION! Thunderbeast Jun 2022 #2

Why only $35? MichMan Jun 2022 #4

$280 billion dollars in damages divided by 8 billion bullets equals $35 per round Thunderbeast Jun 2022 #5

It's a punitive tax DetroitLegalBeagle Jun 2022 #6

Does $712 per gun per year sound better? Thunderbeast Jun 2022 #7

No, its not better. DetroitLegalBeagle Jun 2022 #8

It will get tossed out The Mouth Jun 2022 #9