Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

California

quaint

(3,667 posts)

3. 29) Protects dialysis patients: Expenditures

Reply to Auggie (Original post)

Wed Sep 21, 2022, 08:59 AM

Sep 2022

From CalMatters

A total of $86.3M has been invested in this race. There haven't been any independent expenditures, yet. Independent expenditures are when companies and organizations spend to support or oppose campaigns. There are no spending limits.

The last time we checked for new data was September 20 at 5:40 PM.

OPPONENTS have raised $86.3M (No independent expenditures)
SUPPORTERS have raised $0 (No independent expenditures)

This is so telling. Third time on the ballot and their unlimited funds haven't fooled us yet.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

California Democratic Party / Official Nov 8 2022 State Proposition Endorsements [View all] Auggie Sep 2022 OP

????? on Prop 26 ...... Lovie777 Sep 2022 #1

I'm curious also ... Auggie Sep 2022 #2

29) Protects dialysis patients: Expenditures quaint Sep 2022 #3

The money opponents have spent to defeat these props ... Auggie Sep 2022 #4

A boatload of money Brother Buzz Sep 2022 #10

I'm NO on both 26 and 27. quaint Sep 2022 #5

I'm voting yes on 26, no on 27 Beatlelvr Sep 2022 #6

Prop 30, What would it do? quaint Sep 2022 #7

Prop 30: Why mayors of SJ, Oakland and Newsom are on opposite sides of the EV ballot measure quaint Sep 2022 #9

26 is also bad for native american interests. roody Sep 2022 #8