Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RockRaven

(16,597 posts)
4. For most of the 20th century the population of that town was 1/4 or so of what it is now.
Tue Oct 25, 2022, 01:35 AM
Oct 2022

Even 30 years ago it was half.

A significantly increased population really doesn't help when allocating a finite, scarce resource at a century-low supply.

Add it to the places where one should not expect to live, not without expecting to live very differently than one might live elsewhere.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»Rural California town is ...»Reply #4