Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

California

rpannier

(24,612 posts)

2. My understanding is that Prop 33 would have expanded the law to those built after 1995

Reply to mdbl (Reply #1)

Tue Nov 12, 2024, 06:34 AM

Nov 12

The law currently only applies to buildings before that date.
So, the Apt Assoc wanted No to keep it from covering all houses, apts, etc rented

Basically, keep the status quo

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

LauraInLA

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

California voters rejected Prop 33, one of the most contentious and costly ballot measures for the November ... [View all] IcyPeas Nov 12 OP

I must be reading this post incorrectly mdbl Nov 12 #1

My understanding is that Prop 33 would have expanded the law to those built after 1995 rpannier Nov 12 #2

Ok, thanks mdbl Nov 12 #3

it was a confusing measure BlueWaveNeverEnd Nov 12 #5

It also would have repealed the Costa-Hawkins law which exempted single family homes from rent control. LauraInLA Nov 12 #4