Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Indiana

Historic NY

(37,975 posts)

1. WOW

Reply to sl8 (Original post)

Sat Sep 24, 2022, 06:34 AM

Sep 2022

Walmart's insurance company will go for the juggler to avoid full liability . Who the hell turn off the system designed to suppress and control fire spread.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Walmart Plainfield fire: Company says fire department response made blaze worse [View all] sl8 Sep 2022 OP

WOW Historic NY Sep 2022 #1

Insurance company would have some liability since the fire started before the fire company arrived. 3Hotdogs Sep 2022 #2

I am generally not a huge fan of fire fighters, but in this case I can see they are in the right RAB910 Sep 2022 #3

I would def. think that the doors being open is even more dangerous when the roof has collapsed Hugh_Lebowski Sep 2022 #4

Watched too much Chicago Fire? Xoan Sep 2022 #5

Tort claim was filed four days before the 180-day deadline. AngryOldDem Sep 2022 #6