Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Maine

In reply to the discussion: National park in northern Maine [View all]

avebury

(11,078 posts)
2. I like the idea.
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 07:02 AM
Feb 2013

I grew up in Maine and a lot of Maine is rural (compared to many other states). It is a great state to live in if you love the outdoors. I like the idea of trying to protect the environment.

That aside, I do not trust Congress on the Federal Government to manage the land at its intended purpose. Just google James Watt, Reagan's Secretary of the Interior.

From wikipedia:

Watt's tenure as Secretary of the Interior was controversial, resulting primarily from his perceived hostility to environmentalism and his endorsement of the development and use of federal lands by foresting, ranching, and other commercial interests.

According to the environmental advocacy group Center for Biological Diversity, for more than two decades, Watt had the record for protecting the fewest species by the Endangered Species Act in United States history. The record was surpassed by Dirk Kempthorne, a George W. Bush appointee who, as of August 27, 2007, had not listed a single species in the 15 months since his confirmation.[2]

Greg Wetstone, who was the chief environment council at the House Energy and Commerce Committee during the Reagan administration and later served as director of advocacy at the Natural Resources Defense Council, said Watt was one of the two most "intensely controversial and blatantly anti-environmental political appointees" of American history. (The other was Anne Gorsuch, director of the EPA at that time.)[3] According to the environmental groups, Watt decreased funding for environmental programs,[4] restructured the department to decrease federal regulatory power,[4] wished to eliminate the Land and Water Conservation Fund (which had been designed to increase the size of National Wildlife Refuges and other protected land),[4] eased regulations of oil[4] and mining[4][5] companies, began efforts and directed the National Park Service to draft legislation that would have de-authorized a number of previously Congressionally authorized National Parks,[6] and favored making wilderness areas and shorelands, such as the Santa Monica Bay in southern California, available to commercial leasing for oil and gas exploration and development.[4]

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

National park in northern Maine [View all] old man 76 Feb 2013 OP
Hello from Winthrop, Maine! MarianJack Feb 2013 #1
I like the idea. avebury Feb 2013 #2
I like the idea. I think the loggers might not, though. MADem Feb 2013 #3
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Maine»National park in northern...»Reply #2