Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

merrily

(45,251 posts)
1. "No longer needed on the battlefield?" Why? Seems as though we are always
Mon Aug 25, 2014, 04:43 AM
Aug 2014

"keeping the peace" somewhere or other. Seriously, first aid kits not needed? Wrenches?

Is that really because we got peaceful all of a sudden, or because we order too much and don't want to stop ordering too much?

But, let's assume fo the moment that the military does not need them. Why do local and state police need them?

Supposedly, it's that 911 made us realize suddenly that local police were not equipped to fight terrorists. Tell, me, how could local police have stopped terrorists on 911? Hell, the federal government, military and all, couldn't stop them from hitting the Pentagon.

I think, on 911, the federal government got the bright idea that "national security," esp. "Homeland Security," and "terra" were magic words. That we were so shocked and so frightened by 911, that we would sit still for just about anything we dreamed thought was going to keep "us" safe.

Yeah, I don't think this is about local police fighting terrorists. I think this is about making sure that any uprising by Americans can be quashed before it threatens the rich and/or powerful.






Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Massachusetts»Military surplus equipmen...»Reply #1